Performance assessment of surface-guided radiation therapy and patient setup in head-and-neck and breast cancer patients based on statistical process control

被引:9
|
作者
Li, Zhibin [1 ,2 ]
Xiao, Qing [1 ,2 ]
Li, Guangjun [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Xiaohong [3 ]
Zhang, Yingjie [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Guangyu [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Guyu [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Long [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
Bai, Sen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, State Key Lab Biotherapy, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Panzhihua Univ, Dept Oncol, Affiliated Hosp, Panzhihua, Peoples R China
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2021年 / 89卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Optical surface imaging; Setup error; Process capability index; Exponentially weighted moving average; INTRAFRACTION MOTION; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.08.007
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of SGRT in clinical applications through statistical process control (SPC). Methods: Taking the patients' positioning through optical surface imaging (OSI) as a process, the average level of process execution was defined as the process mean. Setup errors detected by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and OSI were extracted for head-and-neck cancer (HNC) and breast cancer patients. These data were used to construct individual and exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) control charts to analyze outlier fractions and small process shifts from the process mean. Using the control charts and process capability indices derived from this process, the patient positioning-related OSI performance and setup error were analyzed for each patient. Results: Outlier fractions and small shifts from the process mean that are indicative of setup errors were found to be widely prevalent, with the outliers randomly distributed between fractions. A systematic error of up to 1.6 mm between the OSI and CBCT results was observed in all directions, indicating a significantly degraded OSI performance. Adjusting this systematic error for each patient using setup errors of the first five fractions could effectively mitigate these effects. Process capability analysis following adjustment for systematic error indicated that OSI performance was acceptable (process capability index Cpk = 1.0) for HNC patients but unacceptable (Cpk < 0.75) for breast cancer patients. Conclusion: SPC is a powerful tool for detecting the outlier fractions and process changes. Our application of SPC to patient-specific evaluations validated the suitability of OSI in clinical applications involving patient positioning.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 249
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surface-guided setup and intrafraction motion in free-breathing breast cancer radiation therapy
    Kirkegaard, Trine O.
    Jensen, Ingelise
    Kristensen, Thomas O.
    Milo, Marie Louise H.
    Nielsen, Martin S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S3994 - S3996
  • [2] Evaluation of initial patient setup methods for breast cancer between surface-guided radiation therapy and laser alignment based on skin marking in the Halcyon system
    Kang, Seonghee
    Jin, Hyeongmin
    Chang, Ji Hyun
    Jang, Bum-Sup
    Shin, Kyung Hwan
    Choi, Chang Heon
    Kim, Jung-in
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [3] Review of the patient positioning reproducibility in head-and-neck radiotherapy using Statistical Process Control
    Moore, Sarah J.
    Herst, Patries M.
    Louwe, Robert J. W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 (02) : 183 - 189
  • [4] Application of surface-guided radiation therapy in prostate cancer: comparative analysis of differences with skin marking- guided patient setup
    Lee, Jaeha
    Kim, Yeon Joo
    Goh, Youngmoon
    Yang, Eunyeong
    Kim, Ha Un
    Song, Si Yeol
    Kim, Young Seok
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2023, 41 (03): : 172 - 177
  • [5] The Remove-the-Mask Open-Source head and neck Surface-Guided radiation therapy system
    Ben Bouchta, Youssef
    Gardner, Mark
    Sengupta, Chandrima
    Johnson, Julia
    Keall, Paul
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 29
  • [6] Impact of patient setup error in the treatment of head and neck cancer with intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Prabhakar, Ramachandran
    Laviraj, Macherla A.
    Haresh, Kunhi Parambath
    Julka, Pramod K.
    Rath, Goura K.
    PHYSICA MEDICA, 2010, 26 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [7] Using an onboard kilovoltage imager to measure setup deviation in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head-and-neck patients
    Mechalakos, James G.
    Hunt, Margie A.
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    Hong, Linda X.
    Ling, C. Clifton
    Amols, Howard I.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 8 (04): : 28 - 44
  • [8] Surface-Guided Patient Setup Versus Traditional Tattoo Markers for Radiation Therapy: Is Tattoo-Less Setup Feasible for Thorax, Abdomen and Pelvis Treatment?
    Zhao, Hui
    Paxton, Adam
    Sarkar, Vikren
    Price, Ryan G.
    Huang, Jessica
    Su, Fan -Chi Frances
    Li, Xing
    Rassiah, Prema
    Szegedi, Martin
    Salter, Bill
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [9] Monitoring anatomical changes of individual patients using statistical process control during head-and-neck radiotherapy
    Lowther, Nicholas J.
    Hamilton, David A.
    Kim, Han
    Evans, Jamie M.
    Marsh, Steven H.
    Louwe, Robert J. W.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9 : 21 - 27
  • [10] Setup margin for head-and-neck cancer patients receiving 2D-2D and 3D image-guided intensity-modulated radiation therapy
    Kovacs Peter
    Szita Evelin
    Schvarcz Kitti
    Kamu Szabolcs
    Kalincsak Judit
    Kovacs Arpad
    Repa Imre
    Hadjiev Janaki
    ORVOSI HETILAP, 2018, 159 (29) : 1193 - 1200