Exploring the relationship between exposure to technological and gastrointestinal stress and probiotic functional properties of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria

被引:59
作者
Amund, O. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Coventry Univ, Fac Hlth & Life Sci, Sch Life Sci, Priory St, Coventry CV1 5FB, W Midlands, England
关键词
probiotics; gastrointestinal stress; technological stress; functional properties; ANIMALIS SUBSP LACTIS; CELL-SURFACE HYDROPHOBICITY; BIOFILM FORMATION; ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; BILE-SALTS; INTESTINAL LACTOBACILLI; LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES; ENVIRONMENTAL-STRESS; ACID RESISTANCE; RHAMNOSUS GG;
D O I
10.1139/cjm-2016-0186
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium are considered probiotic because of their associated potential health benefits. Probiotics are commonly administered orally via incorporation into food products. Microorganisms for use as probiotics encounter stress conditions, which include acid, bile, osmotic, oxidative, heat and cold stresses. These can occur during processing and storage and during passage through the gastrointestinal tract, and can affect viability. Probiotic bacteria have to remain viable to confer any health benefits. Therefore, the ability to withstand technological and gastrointestinal stresses is crucial probiotic selection criteria. While the stress tolerance mechanisms of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria are largely understood, the impact of exposure to stressful conditions on the functional properties of surviving probiotic microorganisms is not clear. This review explores the potentially positive and negative relationships between exposure to stress conditions and probiotic functional properties, such as resistance to gastric acid and bile, adhesion and colonization potential, and tolerance to antibiotics. Protective strategies can be employed to combat negative effects of stress on functional properties. However, further research is needed to ascertain synergistic relationships between exposure to stress and probiotic properties.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 725
页数:11
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
Ahn JB, 2001, J MICROBIOL BIOTECHN, V11, P443
[2]   Relationship between the resistance to bile salts and low pH with exopolysaccharide (EPS) production of Bifidobacterium spp. isolated from infants feces and breast milk [J].
Alp, Gulcin ;
Aslim, Belma .
ANAEROBE, 2010, 16 (02) :101-105
[3]   Salmonella spp. survival strategies within the host gastrointestinal tract [J].
Alvarez-Ordonez, Avelino ;
Begley, Maire ;
Prieto, Miguel ;
Messens, Winy ;
Lopez, Mercedes ;
Bernardo, Ana ;
Hill, Colin .
MICROBIOLOGY-SGM, 2011, 157 :3268-3281
[4]   Bile Enhances Cell Surface Hydrophobicity and Biofilm Formation of Bifidobacteria [J].
Ambalam, Padma ;
Kondepudi, Kanthi Kiran ;
Nilsson, Ingrid ;
Wadstrom, Torkel ;
Ljungh, Asa .
APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 172 (04) :1970-1981
[5]   Bile stimulates cell surface hydrophobicity, Congo red binding and biofilm formation of Lactobacillus strains [J].
Ambalam, Padma ;
Kondepudi, Kanthi Kiran ;
Nilsson, Ingrid ;
Wadstrom, Torkel ;
Ljungh, Asa .
FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 333 (01) :10-19
[6]   Assessing the effects of exposure to environmental stress on some functional properties of Bifidobacterium animalis ssp lactis [J].
Amund, O. D. ;
Ouoba, L. I. I. ;
Sutherland, J. P. ;
Ghoddusi, H. B. .
BENEFICIAL MICROBES, 2014, 5 (04) :461-469
[7]   Probiotics and health: An evidence-based review [J].
Aureli, Paolo ;
Capurso, Lucio ;
Castellazzi, Anna Maria ;
Clerici, Mario ;
Giovannini, Marcello ;
Morelli, Lorenzo ;
Poli, Andrea ;
Pregliasco, Fabrizio ;
Salvini, Filippo ;
Zuccotti, Gian Vincenzo .
PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 63 (05) :366-376
[8]  
Axelsson L., 2004, LACTIC ACID BACTERIA, DOI 10.1201/9780824752033.ch1
[9]  
Baker H. C., 2009, Journal of Foodservice, V20, P250, DOI 10.1111/j.1748-0159.2009.00147.x
[10]   Invited review: Application of omics tools to understanding probiotic functionality [J].
Baugher, J. L. ;
Klaenhammer, T. R. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (10) :4753-4765