Normative, livelihood, and demographic influences on enrollment in a payment for ecosystem services program

被引:8
|
作者
Giefer, Madeline M. [1 ]
An, Li [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Xiaodong [4 ]
机构
[1] Austin Peay State Univ, Dept Geosci, POB 4418, Clarksville, TN 37044 USA
[2] Dept Geog, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Ctr Complex Human Environm Syst, San Diego, CA USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Social norms; Sloping Land Conversion Program; Land use; Grain to Green Program; China; PES; RURAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME; FOR-GREEN PROGRAM; ENVIRONMENTAL-SERVICES; COLLECTIVE ACTION; SOCIAL NORMS; PARTICIPATION; CHINA; CONSERVATION; GRAIN; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105525
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Payment for ecosystem services (PES) has emerged as a leading conservation mechanism worldwide, and its success depends largely on landholders' willingness to enroll in and comply with these programs. Researchers have suggested program duration and perceived social norms may influence enrollment, but empirical evidence is sparse. There is also conflict over the influence of other socioeconomic, demographic, and farm characteristics. This study, based in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve in southwestern China, uses a choice experiment and mixed-effects model to quantify how payment level, duration of program, social norms, and demographic and economic factors affect farmers' willingness to enroll in a PES program. Results suggest higher neighbor participation increases willingness to enroll, as does higher payment level, but contract duration does not. Other factors associated with higher enrollment include being allowed to plant economically productive trees, having lower educational attainment, having local off-farm work, owning no livestock, and not having lived in one's current neighborhood since birth. These results suggest PES implementers may improve enrollment by targeting households with these conducive characteristics and by utilizing tree species with sellable products like tea and herbs. Moreover, results suggest implementers may improve enrollment by emphasizing neighbors' enrollment while recruiting new participants, thereby capitalizing on perceived social norms.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Determinants and costs of strategic enrollment of landowners in a payments for ecosystem services program in a deforestation hotspot: The Argentine Chaco forest
    Godoy, Cristina C. Nunez
    Branch, Lyn C.
    Pienaar, Elizabeth F.
    Nunez-Regueiro, Mauricio M.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2023, 62
  • [42] Determinants of forest dependent household?s participation in payment for ecosystem services: Evidence from Plantation Establishment Livelihood Improvement Scheme (PELIS) in Kenya
    Waruingi, Esther
    Mbeche, Robert
    Ateka, Josiah
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2021, 26
  • [43] Ex Post Consequentiality and Willingness to Accept: A Case Study of a Payment for Ecosystem Services Program
    Felardo, Jeff
    Hindsley, Paul
    JOURNAL OF FOREST ECONOMICS, 2021, 36 (03) : 265 - 288
  • [44] Estimating residents' WTP for ecosystem services improvement in a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program: A choice experiment approach
    Ureta, J. Carl
    Motallebi, Marzieh
    Vassalos, Michael
    Seagle, Steven
    Baldwin, Robert
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 201
  • [45] Evaluating the Effects of a Minimalist Deliberative Framework on the Willingness to Participate in a Payment for Ecosystem Services Program
    Witt, Brian
    RESOURCES-BASEL, 2019, 8 (02):
  • [46] Managing for resilience: a landscape framework for food and livelihood security and ecosystem services
    Bailey, Ian
    Buck, Louise E.
    FOOD SECURITY, 2016, 8 (03) : 477 - 490
  • [47] Designing a payment for ecosystem services scheme, the practical obstacles for implementation in arid and semiarid rangelands
    Zakeri, Emad
    Mousavi, Seyed Alireza
    Karimzadeh, Hamidreza
    RANGELAND JOURNAL, 2020, 42 (06) : 387 - 400
  • [48] Value orientation and payment for ecosystem services: Perceived detrimental consequences lead to willingness-to-pay for ecosystem services
    Obeng, Elizabeth Asantewaa
    Aguilar, Francisco Xavier
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 206 : 458 - 471
  • [49] Relational values in evaluations of upstream social outcomes of watershed Payment for Ecosystem Services: a review
    Bremer, Leah L.
    Brauman, Kate A.
    Nelson, Sara
    Prado, Kelly Meza
    Wilburn, Eric
    Fiorini, Ana Carolina O.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 35 : 116 - 123
  • [50] Enhancing spatial coordination in payment for ecosystem services schemes with non-pecuniary preferences
    Kuhfuss, Laure
    Preget, Raphaele
    Thoyer, Sophie
    de Vries, Frans P.
    Hanley, Nick
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 192