Effects of paired stimulation with specific waveforms on cortical and spinal plasticity in subjects with a chronic spinal cord injury

被引:8
作者
Adeel, Muhammad [1 ,2 ]
Lai, Chien -Hung [3 ,4 ]
Lin, Bor-Shing [5 ]
Chan, Wing P. [6 ,7 ]
Liou, Jian-Chiun [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Chun-Wei [1 ]
Peng, Chih-Wei [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Biomed Engn, Sch Biomed Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Biomed Engn, Int Ph D Program Biomed Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Med Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taipei Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Informat Engn, New Taipei City, Taiwan
[6] Taipei Med Univ, Wan Fang Hosp, Dept Radiol, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Taipei, Taiwan
[8] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Biomed Engn, Sch Biomed Engn, 250 Wuxing St, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
关键词
Spinal cord injury (SCI); Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); Transspinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS); Paired stimulation (PS); Motor evoked potential (MEP); TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; THETA-BURST-STIMULATION; MOTOR CORTEX; CORTICOSPINAL EXCITABILITY; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; BRAIN-STIMULATION; BASIC PRINCIPLES; REPETITIVE TMS; H-REFLEX; MODULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfma.2022.02.016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Purpose: Paired stimulation can cause neuroplasticity in corticospinal and spinal pathways in subjects with a chronic spinal cord injury (SCI). We aimed to know the effects of different waveforms using paired stimulations with bicycling in subjects with a chronic SCI.Methods: Recruited subjects with an SCI underwent three treatment interventions in random order for 4-20 min followed by 30 min of bicycling (control, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS; rTMS) at 20 Hz with transspinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS), and inter-mittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) with tsDCS with a 1-week gap period. A TMS method was employed to record the resting motor threshold (RMT), the 90% values of which was used as the stimulation intensity, and the Hoffman (H)-reflex was measured by stimulating the tibial nerve in the popliteal fossa. The RMT, motor evoked potential (MEP) latency, MEP peak-to-peak amplitude, and H-reflex latency as primary variables and lower extremity motor scale (LEMS) and modified Ashworth spasticity scale (MAS) as secondary variables were analyzed before and after the interventions.Results: The MEP latency, MEP amplitude, and LEMS significantly improved with the rTMS-iTBS/ tsDCS or the rTMS-20 Hz/tsDCS (p < 0.050) protocols compared to the control intervention. All other outcome measures, including RMT, H-reflex latency, and MAS score showed some changes but did not fully attain a level of significance.Conclusion: The paired stimulation with rTMS-iTBS/tsDCS was equally effective to produce neuroplastic effect in subjects with chronic SCI compared to the conventional TMS-20 Hz/ tsDCS intervention.Copyright 2022, Formosan Medical Association. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:2044 / 2056
页数:13
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Spasticity after spinal cord injury [J].
Adams, MM ;
Hicks, AL .
SPINAL CORD, 2005, 43 (10) :577-586
[2]   Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and trans-spinal direct current stimulation associated with treadmill exercise in spinal cord and cortical excitability of healthy subjects: A triple-blind, randomized and sham-controlled study [J].
Albuquerque, Plinio Luna ;
Campelo, Mayara ;
Mendonca, Thyciane ;
Augusto, Luis ;
Fontes, Mendes ;
Brito, Rodrigo de Mattos ;
Monte-Silva, Katia .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03)
[3]   AN INTRODUCTION TO THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF MAGNETIC NERVE-STIMULATION [J].
BARKER, AT .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 8 (01) :26-37
[4]   Modified Ashworth scale and spasm frequency score in spinal cord injury: reliability and correlation [J].
Baunsgaard, C. B. ;
Nissen, U. V. ;
Christensen, K. B. ;
Biering-Sorensen, F. .
SPINAL CORD, 2016, 54 (09) :702-708
[5]   Magnetic brain stimulation can improve clinical outcome in incomplete spinal cord injured patients [J].
Belci, M ;
Catley, M ;
Husain, M ;
Frankel, HL ;
Davey, NJ .
SPINAL CORD, 2004, 42 (07) :417-419
[6]  
Benito J, 2012, Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil, V18, P106, DOI 10.1310/sci1802-106
[7]   Surgical Neurostimulation for Spinal Cord Injury [J].
Chari, Aswin ;
Hentall, Ian D. ;
Papadopoulos, Marios C. ;
Pereira, Erlick A. C. .
BRAIN SCIENCES, 2017, 7 (02)
[8]   Use of theta-burst stimulation in changing excitability of motor cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Chung, Sung Wook ;
Hill, Aron T. ;
Rogasch, Nigel C. ;
Hoy, Kate E. ;
Fitzgerald, Paul B. .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2016, 63 :43-64
[9]   Transcutaneous spinal cord direct current stimulation inhibits the lower limb nociceptive flexion reflex in human beings [J].
Cogiamanian, Filippo ;
Vergari, Maurizio ;
Schiaffi, Elena ;
Marceglia, Sara ;
Ardolino, Gianluca ;
Barbieri, Sergio ;
Priori, Alberto .
PAIN, 2011, 152 (02) :370-375
[10]   Effect of spinal transcutaneous direct current stimulation on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans [J].
Cogiamanian, Filippo ;
Vergari, Maurizio ;
Pulecchi, Francesca ;
Marceglia, Sara ;
Priori, Alberto .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 119 (11) :2636-2640