A randomized controlled trial of a physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization strategy: Rationale and design of the TARGET FFR study

被引:14
作者
Collison, Damien [1 ,2 ]
McClure, John D. [2 ]
Berry, Colin [1 ,2 ]
Oldroyd, Keith G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Golden Jubilee Natl Hosp, West Scotland Reg Heart & Lung Ctr, Clydebank G81 4DY, Scotland
[2] Univ Glasgow, Inst Cardiovasc & Med Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
coronary physiology; fractional flow reserve; non-hyperemic pressure ratios; PCI optimization; post-PCI FFR; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; DRUG-ELUTING STENT; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MICROVASCULAR RESISTANCE; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; CARDIAC EVENTS; IMPLANTATION; PREDICTION; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1002/clc.23342
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) >= 0.90 confers an improved cardiac prognosis. There are currently limited data available to determine how often it is possible to improve an angiographically acceptable but physiologically suboptimal result. A physiology-guided optimization strategy can achieve a clinically meaningful increase in the proportion of patients achieving a final post-PCI FFR >= 0.90 compared to standard care. Following angiographically successful PCI procedures, 260 patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive either a physiology-guided incremental optimization strategy (intervention group) or blinded post-PCI coronary physiology measurements (control group). Patients undergoing successful, standard-of-care PCI for either stable angina or non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction who meet the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria will be eligible for randomization. The primary endpoint is defined as the proportion of patients with a final post-PCI FFR result >= 0.90. Secondary endpoints include change from baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire and EQ-5D-5L scores at 3 months and the rate of target vessel failure and its components (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, unplanned rehospitalization with target vessel revascularization) at 3 months and 1 year. 260 individual patients were successfully randomized between March 2018 and November 2019. Key baseline demographics of the study population are reported within. TARGET FFR is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial of an FFR-guided PCI optimization strategy. The study has completed recruitment and is now in clinical follow-up. It is anticipated that primary results will be presented in Autumn 2020.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 422
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Utilizing Post-Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve to Optimize Acute Results and the Relationship to Long-Term Outcomes [J].
Agarwal, Shiv K. ;
Kasula, Srikanth ;
Hacioglu, Yalcin ;
Ahmed, Zubair ;
Uretsky, Barry F. ;
Hakeem, Abdul .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (10) :1022-1031
[2]   Clinical and angiographic predictors of persistently ischemic fractional flow reserve after percutaneous revascularization [J].
Agarwal, Shiv Kumar ;
Kasula, Srikanth ;
Almomani, Ahmed ;
Hacioglu, Yalcin ;
Ahmed, Zubair ;
Uretsky, Barry F. ;
Hakeem, Abdul .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 184 :10-16
[3]   Impact of lesion characteristics on the prediction of optimal poststent fractional flow reserve [J].
Ando, Hirohiko ;
Takashima, Hiroaki ;
Suzuki, Akihiro ;
Sakurai, Shinichiro ;
Kumagai, Soichiro ;
Kurita, Akiyoshi ;
Waseda, Katsuhisa ;
Amano, Tetsuya .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 182 :119-124
[4]   FFR result post PCI is suboptimal in long diffuse coronary artery disease [J].
Baranauskas, Arvydas ;
Peace, Aaron ;
Kibarskis, Aleksandras ;
Shannon, Joanne ;
Abraitis, Vytautas ;
Bajoras, Vilhelmas ;
Bilkis, Valdas ;
Aidietis, Audrius ;
Laucevicius, Aleksandras ;
Davidavicius, Giedrius .
EUROINTERVENTION, 2016, 12 (12) :1473-1480
[5]  
Doh JH, 2015, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V27, P346
[6]   Fractional flow reserve compared with intravascular ultrasound guidance for optimizing stent deployment [J].
Fearon, WF ;
Luna, J ;
Samady, H ;
Powers, ER ;
Feldman, T ;
Dib, N ;
Tuzcu, EM ;
Cleman, MW ;
Chou, TM ;
Cohen, DJ ;
Ragosta, M ;
Takagi, A ;
Jeremias, A ;
Fitzgerald, PJ ;
Yeung, AC ;
Kern, MJ ;
Yock, PG .
CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (16) :1917-1922
[7]   Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment [J].
Hanekamp, CEE ;
Koolen, JJ ;
Pijls, NHJ ;
Michels, HR ;
Bonnier, HJRM .
CIRCULATION, 1999, 99 (08) :1015-1021
[8]   Influence of target vessel on prognostic relevance of fractional flow reserve after coronary stenting [J].
Hwang, Doyeon ;
Lee, Joo Myung ;
Lee, Hyun-Jong ;
Kim, Su Hong ;
Nam, Chang-Wook ;
Hahn, Joo-Yong ;
Shin, Eun-Seok ;
Matsuo, Akiko ;
Tanaka, Nobuhiro ;
Matsuo, Hitoshi ;
Lee, Sung Yun ;
Doh, Joon-Hyung ;
Koo, Bon-Kwon .
EUROINTERVENTION, 2019, 15 (05) :457-+
[9]   Utility of myocardial fractional flow reserve for prediction of restenosis following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation [J].
Ishii, Hideshi ;
Kataoka, Toru ;
Kobayashi, Yoshiki ;
Tsumori, Takara ;
Takeshita, Hiroaki ;
Matsumoto, Ryo ;
Shirai, Nobuyuki ;
Nishioka, Hiroki ;
Hasegawa, Takao ;
Nakata, Shinji ;
Shimada, Yoshihisa ;
Ehara, Shoichi ;
Muro, Takashi ;
Yoshiyama, Minoru .
HEART AND VESSELS, 2011, 26 (06) :572-581
[10]   Relationship between fractional flow reserve and residual plaque volume and clinical outcomes after optimal drug-eluting stent implantation: Insight from intravascular ultrasound volumetric analysis [J].
Ito, Tsuyoshi ;
Tani, Tomomitsu ;
Fujita, Hiroshi ;
Ohte, Nobuyuki .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 176 (02) :399-404