The Moral Grounds of Reasonably Mistaken Self-Defense

被引:9
作者
Bolinger, Renee Jorgensen [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
POLICE OFFICERS; RACIAL BIAS; INFORMATION; LIABILITY; DECISION; RISK; LAW;
D O I
10.1111/phpr.12705
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Some, but not all, of the mistakes a person makes when acting in apparently necessary self-defense arereasonable: we take them not to violate the rights of the apparent aggressor. I argue that this is explained by duties grounded in agents' entitlements to a fair distribution of the risk of suffering unjust harm. I suggest that the content of these duties is filled in by a social signaling norm, and offer some moral constraints on the form such a norm can take.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 156
页数:17
相关论文
共 45 条
[11]   Slurs [J].
Croom, Adam M. .
LANGUAGE SCIENCES, 2011, 33 (03) :343-358
[12]   Defense [J].
Draper, Kai .
PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2009, 145 (01) :69-88
[13]  
Draper Kai., 1993, SOCIAL THEORY PRACTI, V19, P73
[14]  
Ferzan K.K., 2012, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, V9, P699
[15]  
Ferzan KK, 2017, LEG THEOR, V23, P168, DOI 10.1017/S135232521700026X
[16]   Justifying self-defense [J].
Ferzan, KK .
LAW AND PHILOSOPHY, 2005, 24 (06) :711-749
[17]   A Practical Account of Self-Defence [J].
Frowe, Helen .
LAW AND PHILOSOPHY, 2010, 29 (03) :245-272
[18]   POSITIVISM AND FIDELITY TO LAW - A REPLY TO PROFESSOR HART [J].
FULLER, LL .
HARVARD LAW REVIEW, 1958, 71 (04) :630-670
[19]  
Gardiner G., 2018, Routledge Handbook of Applied Epistemology
[20]   Risk and the value of information in irreversible decisions [J].
Gersbach, H .
THEORY AND DECISION, 1997, 42 (01) :37-51