Does Ownership Structure Matter for Firm Technological Innovation Performance? The Case of Korean Firms

被引:162
作者
Choi, Suk Bong [2 ]
Park, Byung Il [1 ]
Hong, Paul [3 ]
机构
[1] Hankuk Univ Foreign Studies, Coll Business Adm, 270 Imun Dong, Seoul 130791, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Ulsan, South Korea
[3] Univ Toledo, Toledo, OH USA
关键词
Corporate Governance; Technological Innovation Performance; Ownership Concentration; Ownership Structure; Korea; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; GROUP-AFFILIATED COMPANIES; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM; BUSINESS GROUPS; DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENTS; JAPANESE FIRMS; AGENCY COSTS; COUNT DATA;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8683.2012.00911.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Manuscript Type: Empirical Research Question/Issue: This study examines the influence of firms' ownership structure on their technological innovation performance. First, we have examined whether ownership concentration positively influences technological innovation performance. Then we have investigated the primary reasons for the results derived from the first stage of our analysis by circumstantially exploring the impacts of four different ownership types. Research Findings/Insights: Using five sets of cross-sectional data, consisting of 301 Korean firms, we found that ownership concentration does not have a significant effect on firm technological innovation performance. However, some ownership types (e. g., institutional and foreign) do have a positive effect. Theoretical/Academic Implications: Drawing on agency theory and the resource dependence perspective, our paper is the first to consider a comprehensive treatment of the effect of ownership types on innovation in an emerging country, in particular in contrast to previous studies that have focused on advanced economies. Since only partial predictions suggested by agency and resource dependence perspectives were supported, it appears that neither theory adequately captures the ownership-technological innovation performance relationship. Thus, we suggest that future research should explore the question through a different theoretical lens to better understand the impact of ownership types. We suggest that transaction cost economics can be another path to approach the phenomenon. Practitioner/Policy Implications: This study suggests that managers should recognize how each characteristic of ownership structure (types) influences the building of firm-specific capabilities for innovation. Policy makers and managers should be aware of the impact of the complete range of ownership types on technological innovation performance when they implement corporate governance reform with greater effectiveness. It also suggests that successful technological catch-up and innovation not only require policies for upgrading technology capabilities, but also the setting up of a suitable supporting ownership structure that favors innovation of firms in emerging countries. We suggest that successful technological catch-up and innovation require a supporting ownership structure.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 288
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Does Ownership Identity Matter? A Meta-analysis of Research on Firm Financial Performance in Relation to Government versus Private Ownership [J].
Wang, Kun Tracy ;
Shailer, Greg .
ABACUS-A JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING FINANCE AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2018, 54 (01) :1-35
[42]   Multi-Founding Family Firms: Effects on Firm Governance, Innovation, and Performance [J].
Lim, So-Yeon ;
Jeong, Seung-Hwan .
ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2025, 49 (02) :375-402
[43]   Regional dynamics of ownership structure and their impact on firm performance and firm valuation: A case of Chinese listed companies [J].
Ali, Awais ;
Qiang, Fu ;
Ashraf, Sadia .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND STRATEGY, 2018, 28 (01) :128-146
[44]   Control-ownership Disparity and Business Performance: A Study of Korean Firms [J].
Lee, Sang Wook ;
Chun, Bong Geul .
ASIAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2014, 28 (04) :347-361
[45]   Ownership concentration, innovation and firm performance: empirical study in Indian technology SME context [J].
Chatterjee, Manali ;
Bhattacharjee, Titas .
SOUTH ASIAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS STUDIES, 2021, 10 (02) :149-170
[46]   Does firm diversity-enhancement program bundle matter? Firm performance dimensions, employee ownership program, and environmental technological opportunity [J].
Leung, Wai Kin ;
Yao, Fiona Kun ;
Gong, Yaping ;
Chang, Song .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 34 (16) :3051-3078
[47]   Imitation, Technology, and Firm Performance: The Korean Firms Case in China [J].
Kim, Woo-Hyoung ;
Chen, Bo ;
Hwang, Jin-Soo .
JOURNAL OF KOREA TRADE, 2021, 25 (04) :128-145
[48]   Corporate ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from Greek firms [J].
Kapopoulos, Panayotis ;
Lazaretou, Sophia .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2007, 15 (02) :144-158
[49]   The Effect of R&D and the Control-Ownership Wedge on Firm Value: Evidence from Korean Chaebol Firms [J].
Kang, Minjung ;
Kim, Sangil ;
Cho, Moon-Kyung .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (10)
[50]   Does ownership structure matter in explaining derivatives' use policy in French listed firms [J].
Boubaker, Sabri ;
Mefteh, Salma ;
Shaikh, Junaid M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGERIAL AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING, 2010, 2 (02) :196-212