Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study

被引:16
|
作者
Haugom, Espen W. [1 ,2 ]
Stensrud, Bjorn [1 ]
Beston, Gro [1 ]
Ruud, Torleif [3 ,4 ]
Landheim, Anne S. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Innlandet Hosp Trust, Norwegian Natl Advisory Unit Concurrent Subst Abu, PB 104, N-2381 Brumunddal, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Norwegian Ctr Addict Res SERAF, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Akershus Univ Hosp, Div Mental Hlth Serv, Lorenskog, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[5] Inland Norway Univ Appl Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Elverum, Norway
关键词
Shared decision making; psychotic disorders; mental health services; qualitative research; MENTAL-HEALTH-CARE; SCHIZOPHRENIA; RECOVERY; PEOPLE; PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTIONS; MEDICATION; ENCOUNTER; CAPACITY; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-022-03849-8
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Shared decision making (SDM) is a process where the patient and the health professional collaborate to make decisions based on both the patient's preferences and the best available evidence. Patients with psychotic disorders are less involved in making decisions than they would like. More knowledge of these patients' experiences of SDM may improve implementation. The study aim was to describe and explore experiences of SDM among patients with psychotic disorders in mental health care. Methods Individual interviews were conducted with ten persons with a psychotic disorder. They were service users of two community mental health centres. The transcribed material was analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results Four-fifths of the participants in this study found that they received insufficient information about their health situation and treatment options. All participants experienced that only one kind of treatment was often presented, which was usually medication. Although the study found that different degrees of involvement were practised, two thirds of the participants had little impact on choices to be made. This was despite the fact that they wanted to participate and felt capable of participating, even during periods of more severe illness. The participants described how important it was that SDM in psychosis was based on a trusting relationship, but stated that it took time to establish such a relationship. Conclusions This study with ten participants indicates that patients with psychotic disorders experienced that they were not allowed to participate as much as they wanted to and believed they were capable of. Some patients were involved, but to a lesser degree than in SDM. More and better tailored information communicated within a trusting relationship is needed to provide psychotic patients with a better basis for active involvement in decisions about their health care.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Antipsychotic choice: understanding shared decision-making among doctors and patients
    Yeo, Vivien
    Dowsey, Michelle
    Alguera-Lara, Victoria
    Ride, Jemimah
    Lancsar, Emily
    Castle, David J.
    JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 30 (01) : 66 - 73
  • [42] Developing a Shared Decision-Making Model for Diabetic Patients: A Qualitative Study
    Vaskouei-Eshkevarei, Khorshid
    Hajinabi, Kamran
    Riahi, Leila
    Maleki, Mohammadreza
    GALEN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 10
  • [43] Older patients' experiences of shared decision-making when choosing treatment for their distal radius fracture; A qualitative study
    Nohr, Louise Marie
    Simony, Ane
    Abrahamsen, Charlotte
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA NURSING, 2025, 56
  • [44] Discrepancy in Ratings of Shared Decision Making Between Patients and Health Professionals: A Cross Sectional Study in Mental Health Care
    Drivenes, Karin
    Haaland, Vegard O.
    Hauge, Yina L.
    Vederhus, John-Kare
    Irgens, Audun C.
    Solli, Kristin Klemmetsby
    Regevik, Hilde
    Falk, Ragnhild S.
    Tanum, Lars
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [45] Shared decision-making in standardized cancer patient pathways in Norway-Narratives of patient experiences
    Andersen-Hollekim, Tone
    Melby, Line
    Sand, Kari
    Gilstad, Heidi
    Das, Anita
    Solbjor, Marit
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2021, 24 (05) : 1780 - 1789
  • [46] Consultant psychiatrists’ experiences of and attitudes towards shared decision making in antipsychotic prescribing, a qualitative study
    Andrew Shepherd
    Oliver Shorthouse
    Linda Gask
    BMC Psychiatry, 14
  • [47] Shared decision-making in psychiatry: a study of patient attitudes
    Nott, Josie
    Mcintosh, Aspen
    Taube, Clare
    Taylor, Mark
    AUSTRALASIAN PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 26 (05) : 478 - 481
  • [48] What can patients do to facilitate shared decision making? A qualitative study of patients with depression or schizophrenia and psychiatrists
    Johannes Hamann
    S. Kohl
    R. McCabe
    M. Bühner
    R. Mendel
    M. Albus
    J. Bernd
    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2016, 51 : 617 - 625
  • [49] Patients' Experiences of Participating Actively in Shared Decision-Making in Mental Care
    Beyene, Lise Saestad
    Severinsson, Elisabeth
    Hansen, Britt Saetre
    Rortveit, Kristine
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 2019, 6 (04): : 311 - 317
  • [50] "I think that everybody should be involved": What informs experiences of shared decision-making in supporting people living with schizophrenia spectrum disorders?
    Carrotte, Elise Rose
    Hartup, Michael Everitt
    Lee-Bates, Benjamin
    Blanchard, Michelle
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (07) : 1583 - 1590