Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study

被引:16
|
作者
Haugom, Espen W. [1 ,2 ]
Stensrud, Bjorn [1 ]
Beston, Gro [1 ]
Ruud, Torleif [3 ,4 ]
Landheim, Anne S. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Innlandet Hosp Trust, Norwegian Natl Advisory Unit Concurrent Subst Abu, PB 104, N-2381 Brumunddal, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Norwegian Ctr Addict Res SERAF, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Akershus Univ Hosp, Div Mental Hlth Serv, Lorenskog, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[5] Inland Norway Univ Appl Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Elverum, Norway
关键词
Shared decision making; psychotic disorders; mental health services; qualitative research; MENTAL-HEALTH-CARE; SCHIZOPHRENIA; RECOVERY; PEOPLE; PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTIONS; MEDICATION; ENCOUNTER; CAPACITY; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-022-03849-8
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Shared decision making (SDM) is a process where the patient and the health professional collaborate to make decisions based on both the patient's preferences and the best available evidence. Patients with psychotic disorders are less involved in making decisions than they would like. More knowledge of these patients' experiences of SDM may improve implementation. The study aim was to describe and explore experiences of SDM among patients with psychotic disorders in mental health care. Methods Individual interviews were conducted with ten persons with a psychotic disorder. They were service users of two community mental health centres. The transcribed material was analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results Four-fifths of the participants in this study found that they received insufficient information about their health situation and treatment options. All participants experienced that only one kind of treatment was often presented, which was usually medication. Although the study found that different degrees of involvement were practised, two thirds of the participants had little impact on choices to be made. This was despite the fact that they wanted to participate and felt capable of participating, even during periods of more severe illness. The participants described how important it was that SDM in psychosis was based on a trusting relationship, but stated that it took time to establish such a relationship. Conclusions This study with ten participants indicates that patients with psychotic disorders experienced that they were not allowed to participate as much as they wanted to and believed they were capable of. Some patients were involved, but to a lesser degree than in SDM. More and better tailored information communicated within a trusting relationship is needed to provide psychotic patients with a better basis for active involvement in decisions about their health care.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Understanding the complexities of shared decision-making in cancer: a qualitative study of the perspectives of patients undergoing colorectal surgery
    Hirpara, Dhruvin H.
    Cleghorn, Michelle C.
    Sockalingam, Sanjeev
    Quereshy, Fayez A.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 59 (03) : 197 - 204
  • [32] Qualitative analysis of clinicians' perspectives on the use of a computerized decision aid in the treatment of psychotic disorders
    Roebroek, Lukas O.
    Bruins, Jojanneke
    Delespaul, Philippe
    Boonstra, Albert
    Castelein, Stynke
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [33] Exploring the Experiences of Client Involvement in Medication Decisions Using a Shared Decision Making Model: Results of a Qualitative Study
    Goscha, Richard
    Rapp, Charles
    COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2015, 51 (03) : 267 - 274
  • [34] Shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare: a qualitative study exploring perceptions of barriers and facilitators
    Chong, Wei Wen
    Aslani, Parisa
    Chen, Timothy F.
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2013, 27 (05) : 373 - 379
  • [35] Perceived shared decision-making among patients undergoing lower-limb amputation and their care teams: A qualitative study
    Leonard, Chelsea
    Sayre, George
    Williams, Sienna
    Henderson, Alison
    Norvell, Dan
    Turner, Aaron P.
    Czerniecki, Joseph
    PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 47 (04) : 379 - 386
  • [36] The Practice of Shared Decision-Making Among Physiotherapists and Patients with Musculoskeletal Conditions
    Alotaibi, Mazyad A.
    Alhowimel, Ahmed S.
    Alodaibi, Faris A.
    Aloraifi, Mohammed
    JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2023, 16 : 2655 - 2665
  • [37] Shared decision-making in outpatients with mental disorders: Patients′ preferences and associated factors
    Moran-Sanchez, Ines
    Gomez-Valles, Paula
    Angeles Bernal-Lopez, Maria
    Dolores Perez-Carceles, Maria
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (06) : 1200 - 1209
  • [38] Shared Decision-Making in Hemophilic Arthropathy Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Study
    Liu, Yan-Qiu
    Guo, Yu-Lin
    Xu, Jia
    Geng, Wen-Jing
    Li, Zhen-Zhen
    Jia, Ming
    Liu, Yu-Dan
    Zhao, Hua
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2023, 17 : 249 - 257
  • [39] Barriers of and strategies for shared decision-making implementation in the care of metastatic breast cancer: A qualitative study among patients and healthcare professionals in an Asian country
    Lee, Ping Yein
    Cheong, Ai Theng
    Ghazali, Sazlina Shariff
    Rashid, Aneesa Abdul
    Ong, Siu Ching
    Ong, Soo Ying
    Alip, Adlinda
    Sylvia, McCarthy
    Chen, May Feng
    Taib, Nur Aishah
    Jaganathan, Maheswari
    Ng, Chirk Jenn
    Teo, Soo-Hwang
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2022, 25 (06) : 2837 - 2850
  • [40] Practitioners' views on shared decision-making implementation: A qualitative study
    Ankolekar, Anshu
    Steffensen, Karina Dahl
    Olling, Karina
    Dekker, Andre
    Wee, Leonard
    Roumen, Cheryl
    Hasannejadasl, Hajar
    Fijten, Rianne
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (11):