Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study

被引:23
作者
Haugom, Espen W. [1 ,2 ]
Stensrud, Bjorn [1 ]
Beston, Gro [1 ]
Ruud, Torleif [3 ,4 ]
Landheim, Anne S. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Innlandet Hosp Trust, Norwegian Natl Advisory Unit Concurrent Subst Abu, PB 104, N-2381 Brumunddal, Norway
[2] Univ Oslo, Norwegian Ctr Addict Res SERAF, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[3] Akershus Univ Hosp, Div Mental Hlth Serv, Lorenskog, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[5] Inland Norway Univ Appl Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Elverum, Norway
关键词
Shared decision making; psychotic disorders; mental health services; qualitative research; MENTAL-HEALTH-CARE; SCHIZOPHRENIA; RECOVERY; PEOPLE; PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTIONS; MEDICATION; ENCOUNTER; CAPACITY; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-022-03849-8
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Shared decision making (SDM) is a process where the patient and the health professional collaborate to make decisions based on both the patient's preferences and the best available evidence. Patients with psychotic disorders are less involved in making decisions than they would like. More knowledge of these patients' experiences of SDM may improve implementation. The study aim was to describe and explore experiences of SDM among patients with psychotic disorders in mental health care. Methods Individual interviews were conducted with ten persons with a psychotic disorder. They were service users of two community mental health centres. The transcribed material was analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results Four-fifths of the participants in this study found that they received insufficient information about their health situation and treatment options. All participants experienced that only one kind of treatment was often presented, which was usually medication. Although the study found that different degrees of involvement were practised, two thirds of the participants had little impact on choices to be made. This was despite the fact that they wanted to participate and felt capable of participating, even during periods of more severe illness. The participants described how important it was that SDM in psychosis was based on a trusting relationship, but stated that it took time to establish such a relationship. Conclusions This study with ten participants indicates that patients with psychotic disorders experienced that they were not allowed to participate as much as they wanted to and believed they were capable of. Some patients were involved, but to a lesser degree than in SDM. More and better tailored information communicated within a trusting relationship is needed to provide psychotic patients with a better basis for active involvement in decisions about their health care.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 63 条
[51]   The Antipsychotic Medication Management Fidelity Scale: Psychometric properties [J].
Ruud, Torleif ;
Drivenes, Karin ;
Drake, Robert E. ;
Haaland, Vegard oksendal ;
Landers, Matthew ;
Stensrud, Bjorn ;
Heiervang, Kristin S. ;
Tanum, Lars ;
Bond, Gary R. .
ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 47 (06) :911-919
[52]   Where Is the Evidence? A Systematic Review of Shared Decision Making and Patient Outcomes [J].
Shay, L. Aubree ;
Lafata, Jennifer Elston .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2015, 35 (01) :114-131
[53]   Consultant psychiatrists' experiences of and attitudes towards shared decision making in antipsychotic prescribing, a qualitative study [J].
Shepherd, Andrew ;
Shorthouse, Oliver ;
Gask, Linda .
BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 14
[54]   Invocation of coercion context in compliance communication -: power dynamics in psychiatric care [J].
Sjöström, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 29 (01) :36-47
[55]  
Slade M., 2009, Personal Recovery and Mental Illness: A Guide For Mental Health Professionals, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511581649, 10.1017/CBO9780511581649]
[56]   Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care [J].
Slade, Mike .
WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 16 (02) :146-153
[57]   Diversity or disarray? A systematic review of decision-making capacity for treatment and research in schizophrenia and other non-affective psychoses [J].
Spencer, B. W. J. ;
Shields, G. ;
Gergel, T. ;
Hotopf, M. ;
Owen, G. S. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2017, 47 (11) :1906-1922
[58]  
Stacey D, 2017, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5, 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub6]
[59]   Compulsion and "coercion" in mental health care [J].
Szmukler, George .
WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 14 (03) :259-261
[60]   Time to Support Extensive Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Psychiatry [J].
Zisman-Ilani, Yaara ;
Roth, Robert M. ;
Mistler, Lisa A. .
JAMA PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 78 (11) :1183-1184