Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward

被引:138
作者
Boyer, Robert H. W. [1 ]
Peterson, Nicole D. [2 ]
Arora, Poonam [3 ]
Caldwell, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Geog & Earth Sci, McEniry 324,9201 Univ City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Anthropol, Barnard 217,9201 Univ City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[3] Manhattan Coll, Dept Management & Mkt, Sch Business, 518 De LaSalle,4513 Manhattan Coll Pkwy, Riverdale, NY 10471 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
social sustainability; three-pillar model; sustainable development; interdisciplinary; DECISION-MAKING; LOCAL KNOWLEDGE; PARTICIPATION; AFFILIATION; TRANSITIONS; POLITICS; CITIES;
D O I
10.3390/su8090878
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainability is often conceived of as an attempt to balance competing economic, environmental and social priorities. Over the course of three decades of scholarship, however, the meaning and appropriate application of the social pillar' continues to inspire confusion. In this paper, we posit that the inherent challenge of understanding social sustainability is its many legitimate meanings plus a lack of interdisciplinary scholarship. We draw from literature in multiple disciplines to illustrate five different ways that the concept of social sustainability has been applied in scholarship and professional practice, and highlighting the importance of applications that acknowledge placed-based, process-oriented perspectives that understand social, economic, and environmental imperatives as integrated concepts. Ironically, this framing forecloses on social sustainability as an entity distinct from environmental and economic sustainability. We believe that organizing the conversation around these five applications can help advocates of sustainability use the concept of social sustainability in clear and powerful ways while avoiding applications that relegate the social dimensions of sustainability to an afterthought.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 95 条
[51]   The long history of environmental migration: Assessing vulnerability construction and obstacles to successful relocation in Shishmaref, Alaska [J].
Marino, Elizabeth .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2012, 22 (02) :374-381
[52]  
Mauss Marcel., 1954, The Gift
[53]  
Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies
[54]   Decolonizing Academia: Intersectionality, Participation, and Accountability in Family Therapy and Counseling [J].
McDowell, Teresa ;
Hernandez, Pilar .
JOURNAL OF FEMINIST FAMILY THERAPY, 2010, 22 (02) :93-111
[55]  
Milan B.F., 2016, J ENVIRON STUD SCI, V6, P520, DOI DOI 10.1007/S13412-014-0217-5
[56]   W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting [J].
Milne, Markus J. ;
Gray, Rob .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2013, 118 (01) :13-29
[57]  
Murphy K., 2012, Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy, V8, P15, DOI [DOI 10.1080/15487733.2012.11908081, 10.1080/15487733.2012.11908081]
[58]  
Murray J., 2007, CYBERNETICS HUMAN KN, V14, P87
[59]   Moving towards urban sustainability in Kenya: a framework for integration of environmental, economic, social and governance dimensions [J].
Mutisya, Emmanuel ;
Yarime, Masaru .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2014, 9 (02) :205-215
[60]   Local knowledge and memory in biodiversity conservation [J].
Nazarea, Virginia D. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANTHROPOLOGY, 2006, 35 :317-335