Five Approaches to Social Sustainability and an Integrated Way Forward

被引:125
作者
Boyer, Robert H. W. [1 ]
Peterson, Nicole D. [2 ]
Arora, Poonam [3 ]
Caldwell, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Geog & Earth Sci, McEniry 324,9201 Univ City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Anthropol, Barnard 217,9201 Univ City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[3] Manhattan Coll, Dept Management & Mkt, Sch Business, 518 De LaSalle,4513 Manhattan Coll Pkwy, Riverdale, NY 10471 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
social sustainability; three-pillar model; sustainable development; interdisciplinary; DECISION-MAKING; LOCAL KNOWLEDGE; PARTICIPATION; AFFILIATION; TRANSITIONS; POLITICS; CITIES;
D O I
10.3390/su8090878
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainability is often conceived of as an attempt to balance competing economic, environmental and social priorities. Over the course of three decades of scholarship, however, the meaning and appropriate application of the social pillar' continues to inspire confusion. In this paper, we posit that the inherent challenge of understanding social sustainability is its many legitimate meanings plus a lack of interdisciplinary scholarship. We draw from literature in multiple disciplines to illustrate five different ways that the concept of social sustainability has been applied in scholarship and professional practice, and highlighting the importance of applications that acknowledge placed-based, process-oriented perspectives that understand social, economic, and environmental imperatives as integrated concepts. Ironically, this framing forecloses on social sustainability as an entity distinct from environmental and economic sustainability. We believe that organizing the conversation around these five applications can help advocates of sustainability use the concept of social sustainability in clear and powerful ways while avoiding applications that relegate the social dimensions of sustainability to an afterthought.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Abel T., 2015, Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, V16, P124
  • [2] Skewed riskscapes and environmental injustice: A case study of metropolitan St. Louis
    Abel, Troy D.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 42 (02) : 232 - 248
  • [3] Agyeman J., 2002, Space Polity, V6, P77, DOI [10.1080/13562570220137907, DOI 10.1080/13562570220137907]
  • [4] Sustainable development footprint: A framework for assessing sustainable development risks and opportunities in time and space
    Amekudzi, Adjo
    Khayesi, Meleckidzedeck
    Khisty, C. Jotin
    [J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2015, 18 (1-2) : 9 - 40
  • [5] Using the sustainability footprint model to assess development impacts of transportation systems
    Amekudzi, Adjo A.
    Khisty, C. Jotin
    Khayesi, Meleckidzedeck
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2009, 43 (04) : 339 - 348
  • [6] Anderson Elijah., 1992, STREETWISE RACE CLAS
  • [7] A Sensemaking Approach to Trade-Offs and Synergies Between Human and Ecological Elements of Corporate Sustainability
    Angus-Leppan, Tamsin
    Benn, Suzanne
    Young, Louise
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 19 (04) : 230 - 244
  • [8] Arora P., 2016, SUSTAIN SCI PRACT PO, V12
  • [9] Ownership effect in the wild: Influence of land ownership on agribusiness goals and decisions in the Argentine Pampas
    Arora, Poonam
    Bert, Federico
    Podesta, Guillermo
    Krantz, David H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 58 : 162 - 170
  • [10] To cooperate or not to cooperate: Using new methodologies and frameworks to understand how affiliation influences cooperation in the present and future
    Arora, Poonam
    Peterson, Nicole D.
    Krantz, David H.
    Hardisty, David J.
    Reddy, Kavita S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 33 (04) : 842 - 853