Multi-criteria Analysis and Decision Methodology for the Selection of Internet-of-Things Hardware Platforms

被引:10
作者
Silva, Edgar M. [1 ,2 ]
Jardim-Goncalves, Ricardo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nova Lisboa, Fac Ciencias & Tecnol, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Nova Lisboa, Ctr Tecnol & Sistemas, Caparica, Portugal
来源
TECHNICAL INNOVATION FOR SMART SYSTEMS (DOCEIS 2017) | 2017年 / 499卷
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
IoT; Smart Systems; Decision making; Analytic Hierarchy Process; Arduino; MAKING METHODS;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-56077-9_10
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Internet-of-Things (IoT) is today a reality, and Smart Systems have taken advantage of this to improve its own sense, act and control capabilities. IoT is a highly heterogeneous environment composed by a vast number of "things" (sensors, smart objects, etc.). These "things" are based on hardware platforms which can differ widely since manufactures are being capable of develop new devices every day to tackle different application domains. Consequently, a problem emerges regarding which will be the suitable, proper hardware solution for an IoT deployment. Make a right decision is probably one of the toughest challenges for science and technology managers. This work proposes a novel methodology to analyze a set of hardware alternatives based on user's multi-criteria requirements, and advice on the more suitable hardware solution for a specific situation. For proof-of-concept it is used different Arduino boards as hardware alternatives, in which user requirements are based on hardware features. This methodology foresees its use during the development of Smart Systems (e.g.: Transportation, Healthcare) to optimize the selection of hardware platforms.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 121
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] SYSTRA-SQ: a new measure of bank service quality
    Aldlaigan, AH
    Buttle, FA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SERVICE INDUSTRY MANAGEMENT, 2002, 13 (3-4): : 362 - 381
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, MULT AN MAN
  • [3] Aruldoss M., 2013, Am. J. Inform. Syst, V1, P31, DOI DOI 10.12691/AJIS-1-1-5
  • [4] Boucher T. O., 1991, Engineering Economist, V37, P1, DOI 10.1080/00137919108903055
  • [5] A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD - (THE PROMETHEE METHOD FOR MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING)
    BRANS, JP
    VINCKE, PH
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (06) : 647 - 656
  • [6] Figueira J, 2005, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V78, P133, DOI 10.1007/0-387-23081-5_4
  • [7] Humans' Critical Role in Smart Systems: A Smart Firefighting Example
    Jones, Albert
    Subrahmanian, Eswaran
    Hamins, Anthony
    Grant, Casey
    [J]. IEEE INTERNET COMPUTING, 2015, 19 (03) : 28 - 31
  • [8] A Comparative Study of Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Methods under Stochastic Inputs
    Kolios, Athanasios
    Mytilinou, Varvara
    Lozano-Minguez, Estivaliz
    Salonitis, Konstantinos
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2016, 9 (07)
  • [9] Mateo J.R. S. C., 2012, MULTICRITERIA ANAL R
  • [10] Comparative study of multiple criteria decision making methods for building design
    Mela, Kristo
    Tiainen, Teemu
    Heinisuo, Markku
    [J]. ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2012, 26 (04) : 716 - 726