Prediction of Multiple-Trait and Multiple-Environment Genomic Data Using Recommender Systems

被引:13
|
作者
Montesinos-Lopez, Osval A. [1 ]
Montesinos-Lopez, Abelardo [2 ]
Crossa, Jose [3 ]
Montesinos-Lopez, Jose C. [4 ]
Mota-Sanchez, David [5 ]
Estrada-Gonzalez, Fermin [1 ]
Gillberg, Jussi [6 ]
Singh, Ravi [3 ]
Mondal, Suchismita [3 ]
Juliana, Philomin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colima, Fac Telemat, Colima 28040, Mexico
[2] Univ Guadalajara, CUCEI, Dept Matemat, Guadalajara 44430, Jalisco, Mexico
[3] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr CIMMYT, Apdo Postal 6-641, Mexico City 06600, DF, Mexico
[4] Ctr Invest Matemat CIMAT, Dept Estadist, Guanajuato 36240, Mexico
[5] Michigan State Univ, Dept Entomol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[6] Aalto Univ, Dept Comp Sci, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland
来源
G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS | 2018年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
genomic information; item-based collaborative filtering; matrix factorization; multi-trait; genotype; environment interaction; prediction accuracy; collaborative filtering; GenPred; Shared Data Resources; Genomic Selection;
D O I
10.1534/g3.117.300309
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
In genomic-enabled prediction, the task of improving the accuracy of the prediction of lines in environments is difficult because the available information is generally sparse and usually has low correlations between traits. In current genomic selection, although researchers have a large amount of information and appropriate statistical models to process it, there is still limited computing efficiency to do so. Although some statistical models are usually mathematically elegant, many of them are also computationally inefficient, and they are impractical for many traits, lines, environments, and years because they need to sample from huge normal multivariate distributions. For these reasons, this study explores two recommender systems: item-based collaborative filtering (IBCF) and the matrix factorization algorithm (MF) in the context of multiple traits and multiple environments. The IBCF and MF methods were compared with two conventional methods on simulated and real data. Results of the simulated and real data sets show that the IBCF technique was slightly better in terms of prediction accuracy than the two conventional methods and the MF method when the correlation was moderately high. The IBCF technique is very attractive because it produces good predictions when there is high correlation between items (environment-trait combinations) and its implementation is computationally feasible, which can be useful for plant breeders who deal with very large data sets.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 147
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multiple-trait quantitative trait locus mapping with incomplete phenotypic data
    Zhigang Guo
    James C Nelson
    BMC Genetics, 9
  • [22] Multiple-trait quantitative trait locus mapping with incomplete phenotypic data
    Guo, Zhigang
    Nelson, James C.
    BMC GENETICS, 2008, 9 (1)
  • [23] Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models
    Karoui, Sofiene
    Jesus Carabano, Maria
    Diaz, Clara
    Legarra, Andres
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2012, 44
  • [24] Multiple-trait genomic prediction of harvest and fillet traits in Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer, Bloch 1790)
    Sukhavachana, Sila
    Senanan, Wansuk
    Pattarapanyawong, Naruechon
    Srithong, Chumpol
    Joerakate, Weerakit
    Tunkijjanukij, Suriyan
    Poompuang, Supawadee
    AQUACULTURE, 2021, 544
  • [25] Genomic-based multiple-trait evaluation in Eucalyptus grandis using dominant DArT markers
    Cappa, Eduardo P.
    El-Kassaby, Yousry A.
    Munoz, Facundo
    Garcia, Martin N.
    Villalba, Pamela V.
    Klapste, Jaroslav
    Marcucci Poltri, Susana N.
    PLANT SCIENCE, 2018, 271 : 27 - 33
  • [26] DEVELOPING MULTIPLE-TRAIT PREDICTION MODELS USING GROWTH AND PRODUCTION TRAITS IN MURRAH BUFFALO
    Gupta, Jay Prakash
    Sachdeva, Gulshan K.
    Gandhi, R. S.
    Chakaravarty, A. K.
    BUFFALO BULLETIN, 2015, 34 (03): : 347 - 355
  • [27] Multiple-trait single-step genomic evaluation for hoof health.
    Malchiodi, F.
    Jamrozik, J.
    Christen, A. -M.
    Fleming, A.
    Kistemaker, G. J.
    Richardson, C.
    Daniel, V.
    Kelton, D. F.
    Schenkel, F. S.
    Miglior, F.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 : 140 - 140
  • [28] Multiple-trait quantitative trait loci analysis using a large mouse sibship
    Jackson, AU
    Fornés, A
    Galecki, A
    Miller, RA
    Burke, DT
    GENETICS, 1999, 151 (02) : 785 - 795
  • [29] MULTIPLE-TRAIT SELECTION IN JACK PINE
    ADAMS, GW
    MORGENSTERN, EK
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1991, 21 (04): : 439 - 445
  • [30] Symposium review: Multiple-trait single-step genomic evaluation for hoof health
    Malchiodi, F.
    Jamrozik, J.
    Christen, A. -M.
    Fleming, A.
    Kistemaker, G. J.
    Richardson, C.
    Daniel, V.
    Kelton, D. F.
    Schenkel, F. S.
    Miglior, F.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 (06) : 5346 - 5353