Prediction of Multiple-Trait and Multiple-Environment Genomic Data Using Recommender Systems

被引:13
|
作者
Montesinos-Lopez, Osval A. [1 ]
Montesinos-Lopez, Abelardo [2 ]
Crossa, Jose [3 ]
Montesinos-Lopez, Jose C. [4 ]
Mota-Sanchez, David [5 ]
Estrada-Gonzalez, Fermin [1 ]
Gillberg, Jussi [6 ]
Singh, Ravi [3 ]
Mondal, Suchismita [3 ]
Juliana, Philomin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colima, Fac Telemat, Colima 28040, Mexico
[2] Univ Guadalajara, CUCEI, Dept Matemat, Guadalajara 44430, Jalisco, Mexico
[3] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr CIMMYT, Apdo Postal 6-641, Mexico City 06600, DF, Mexico
[4] Ctr Invest Matemat CIMAT, Dept Estadist, Guanajuato 36240, Mexico
[5] Michigan State Univ, Dept Entomol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[6] Aalto Univ, Dept Comp Sci, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland
来源
G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS | 2018年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
genomic information; item-based collaborative filtering; matrix factorization; multi-trait; genotype; environment interaction; prediction accuracy; collaborative filtering; GenPred; Shared Data Resources; Genomic Selection;
D O I
10.1534/g3.117.300309
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
In genomic-enabled prediction, the task of improving the accuracy of the prediction of lines in environments is difficult because the available information is generally sparse and usually has low correlations between traits. In current genomic selection, although researchers have a large amount of information and appropriate statistical models to process it, there is still limited computing efficiency to do so. Although some statistical models are usually mathematically elegant, many of them are also computationally inefficient, and they are impractical for many traits, lines, environments, and years because they need to sample from huge normal multivariate distributions. For these reasons, this study explores two recommender systems: item-based collaborative filtering (IBCF) and the matrix factorization algorithm (MF) in the context of multiple traits and multiple environments. The IBCF and MF methods were compared with two conventional methods on simulated and real data. Results of the simulated and real data sets show that the IBCF technique was slightly better in terms of prediction accuracy than the two conventional methods and the MF method when the correlation was moderately high. The IBCF technique is very attractive because it produces good predictions when there is high correlation between items (environment-trait combinations) and its implementation is computationally feasible, which can be useful for plant breeders who deal with very large data sets.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 147
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A singular value decomposition Bayesian multiple-trait and multiple-environment genomic model
    Osval A. Montesinos-López
    Abelardo Montesinos-López
    José Crossa
    Juan Manuel Kismiantini
    Ravi Ramírez-Alcaraz
    S. Singh
    P. Mondal
    Heredity, 2019, 122 : 381 - 401
  • [2] A singular value decomposition Bayesian multiple-trait and multiple-environment genomic model
    Montesinos-Lopez, Osval A.
    Montesinos-Lopez, Abelardo
    Crossa, Jose
    Kismiantini
    Manuel Ramirez-Alcaraz, Juan
    Singh, Ravi
    Mondal, S.
    Juliana, P.
    HEREDITY, 2019, 122 (04) : 381 - 401
  • [3] A Bayesian Poisson-lognormal Model for Count Data for Multiple-Trait Multiple-Environment Genomic-Enabled Prediction
    Montesinos-Lopez, Osval A.
    Montesinos-Lopez, Abelardo
    Crossa, Jose
    Toledo, Fernando H.
    Montesinos-Lopez, Jose C.
    Singh, Pawan
    Juliana, Philomin
    Salinas-Ruiz, Josafhat
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2017, 7 (05): : 1595 - 1606
  • [4] Multivariate Bayesian Analysis of On-Farm Trials with Multiple-Trait and Multiple-Environment Data
    Montesinos-Lopez, Osval A.
    Montesinos-Lopez, Abelardo
    Vargas Hernandez, Mateo
    Ortiz-Monasterio, Ivan
    Perez-Rodriguez, Paulino
    Burgueno, Juan
    Crossa, Jose
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2019, 111 (06) : 2658 - 2669
  • [5] Comparison of single-trait and multiple-trait genomic prediction models
    Gang Guo
    Fuping Zhao
    Yachun Wang
    Yuan Zhang
    Lixin Du
    Guosheng Su
    BMC Genetics, 15
  • [6] Comparison of single-trait and multiple-trait genomic prediction models
    Guo, Gang
    Zhao, Fuping
    Wang, Yachun
    Zhang, Yuan
    Du, Lixin
    Su, Guosheng
    BMC GENETICS, 2014, 15
  • [7] Multiple-trait genetic evaluation using genomic matrix
    Rostami-Angasi, Mahboubeh
    Sodagar-Amiri, Ahmad
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2011, 10 (33): : 6198 - 6202
  • [8] PREDICTION CONTROL AND MULTIPLE-ENVIRONMENT PROBLEM
    TEDESCHI, JT
    PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 1966, 16 (04): : 409 - &
  • [9] Genomic Prediction from Multiple-Trait Bayesian Regression Methods Using Mixture Priors
    Cheng, Hao
    Kizilkaya, Kadir
    Zeng, Jian
    Garrick, Dorian
    Fernando, Rohan
    GENETICS, 2018, 209 (01) : 89 - 103
  • [10] Multiple-trait QTL mapping and genomic prediction for wool traits in sheep
    Bolormaa, Sunduimijid
    Swan, Andrew A.
    Brown, Daniel J.
    Hatcher, Sue
    Moghaddar, Nasir
    van der Werf, Julius H.
    Goddard, Michael E.
    Daetwyler, Hans D.
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2017, 49