The Dose Distribution from Iridium-192 Source on Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy by Manchester System Using Monte Carlo Simulation

被引:1
作者
Kurniati, F. [1 ]
Krisna, F. P. [1 ]
Junios, J. [2 ]
Haryanto, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Teknol Bandung, Fac Math & Nat Sci, Jl Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia
[2] Inst Kesehatan Prima Nusantara Bukittinggi, Jl Kusuma Bhakti 99 Gulai Bancah Bukittinggi, West Sumatera 26122, Indonesia
关键词
Brachytherapy; CT image; Ir-192; source; Manchester system; Monte carlo simulation;
D O I
10.17146/aij.2021.1102
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
One treatment for cervical cancer is to use radioactive sources that directly target the cancer cell called brachytherapy. This study is aimed to determine dose distribution at phantom pelvis using the DOSXYZnrc Monte Carlo code. The phantom was derived from a CT scan image of the DICOM-type pelvis with a size of 50 x 50 x 28.8 cm obtained from Santosa Kopo Hospital. The source used was Ir-192, which makes an asymmetrical beam with a size of 0.45 x 0.09 x 0.09 cm. Monte Carlo simulation was performed to determine the dose distribution of the Ir-192 source on cervical cancer CT images based on the Manchester system. The Monte Carlo simulation was divided into two models with distance variations on the applicator. Model A used TPS data with a distance between sources of 0.9 cm, while model B had a distance between sources of 0.5 cm. The distribution of dose resulting from the Monte Carlo simulation was analyzed and compared with TPS data. The results showed that at the range of 50 %, dose distribution in model A reaches the end of 3.9 cm. When compared to the range of 50 % dose distribution at the TPS results that reaches the point of 4 cm, it produces a deviation value of 2.5 %, which is still within the tolerance range. Model A and Model B provide different dose distribution. In model B, it reaches 3.86 cm, resulting in a deviation of 1.02 %, which is still within the tolerance range. The resulting gamma-index value for the 50 % dose distribution was 2.26, while the whole area's GPR value was 94.13 %. This indicates a difference in dose distribution between the two models. Therefore, the smaller the distance between the sources, the shorter the dose distribution range with relatively more uniform dose distribution. (C) 2021 Atom Indonesia. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 211
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Monte Carlo Simulation of an Ir-192 Brachytherapy Source Spectra, Geometry and Anysotropy Factors Using Geant4 Code [J].
Fonseca-Rodrigues, S. S. O. ;
Begalli, M. ;
Queiroz Filho, P. P. ;
Souza-Santos, D. .
2009 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM CONFERENCE RECORD, VOLS 1-5, 2009, :544-+
[2]  
Gentle J. E., 2003, RANDOM NUMBER GENERA, V2nd, P25
[3]   Characterization of Gamma Knife Perfexion™ source based on Monte Carlo simulation [J].
Junios, J. ;
Irhas, I. ;
Novitrian, N. ;
Soediatmoko, E. ;
Haryanto, F. ;
Su'ud, Z. ;
Fielding, A. L. .
RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 13 (04) :398-404
[4]  
Junios Sainstek, 2012, JURNAL SAINS DAN TEK, V4, P26
[5]  
Kariman D., 2016, JURNAL IPTEK TERAPAN, V10, P155
[6]  
Kawrakow I., 2011, NRCC Report PIRS-701
[7]  
Krisna F. P., 2020, J PHYS C SER, V1505
[8]   Role of step size and max dwell time in anatomy based inverse optimization for prostate implants [J].
Manikandan, Arjunan ;
Sarkar, Biplab ;
Rajendran, Vivek Thirupathur ;
King, Paul R. ;
Sresty, N. V. Madhusudhana ;
Holla, Ragavendra ;
Kotur, Sachin ;
Nadendla, Sujatha .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 38 (03) :148-154
[9]  
Moseley H., 1993, 119 NCRP, P397
[10]  
Papanikolaou N., 2004, REPORT TASK GROUP NO, V85, P1, DOI [10.37206/86, DOI 10.37206/86]