Application of system identification to time-domain modeling of electromagnetic structures

被引:0
|
作者
Coccetti, F [1 ]
Russer, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Hochfrequenztech, D-80333 Munich, Germany
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Time domain techniques as the transmission line matrix (TLM) method, allow to characterize an electromagnetic structure in a wide frequency band with a single simulation. However, in the case of the modeling of low loss electromagnetic structures, the transient response to impulsive excitation will exhibit a long decay time, and to obtain accurate results, simulation times are required which exceed the time discretization interval by several orders of magnitude. The computational time may be reduced considerably by applying system identification (SI) methods. SI approaches, which analyze exciting impulses and corresponding transient responses simultaneously, or spectral analysis (SA) methods can be used to extract transfer admittance and impedance matrices of electromagnetic systems for the subsequent calculation of their corresponding Foster matrix representations [1, 2]. It is well known that input signals which are zero (or sufficiently small) outside some common, sufficiently short, time interval, tend to have essentially the same effect to a macroscopic system [3]. This is a direct consequence of the fact that the spectrum of a sufficiently short transient input signal is broad enough to cover most of the useful spectrum of an electromagnetic device. Under this condition, the determination of the model parameters can be easily performed by means of a system response analysis. From the class of SI methods, Prony's model based techniques [2] are the most popular approaches for the extraction of poles and residues from available transient responses (both simulated or measured). These methods seek to fit a deterministic exponential model to the discrete-time waveforms that constitute the transient response obtained using one of the time-domain methods like TLM or FDTD. In this work, the correspondence between the Pronys model and the equivalent Foster representation of the impedance parameters on the base of the network oriented theory [11] will be shown. An algorithm able to autonomously generate the model once accuracy tolerances and frequency range have been specified, will be presented. This algorithm referred at as Prony's model based System Identification (PMSI) allows adaptive model order estimation by separating the signal subspace from the noise subspace with a SVD based technique [6], while the poles estimation is based on the Pencil Matrix method [7]. The aim of the PMSI algorithm is twofold. in case of time-domain analysis it may be used as impulse response predictor, by yielding a reduction of the overall analysis. Secondly it can be used to extract the Foster's representation directly from the available time domain responses. For both applications numerical results for a one-port passive network are presented and the extension to arbitrary multiport example is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 156
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Three component time-domain electromagnetic surveying: Modeling and data analysis
    Chen, Chow-Son
    Chiu, Wei-Hsuan
    Lin, Ching-Ren
    PIERS 2008 HANGZHOU: PROGRESS IN ELECTROMAGNETICS RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 366 - +
  • [32] RESOLUTION IN TIME-DOMAIN ELECTROMAGNETIC SOUNDING
    KELLER, GV
    WHAN, WJ
    SAITO, A
    GARG, N
    GEOPHYSICS, 1986, 51 (02) : 443 - 444
  • [33] Parallel Dispersive Finite-Difference Time-Domain Modeling of Three-Dimensional Electromagnetic Cloaking Structures
    Zhao, Y.
    Hao, Y.
    ICEAA: 2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTROMAGNETICS IN ADVANCED APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 315 - +
  • [34] Time-Domain Measurements of Electromagnetic Interference
    Braun, Stephan
    Frech, Arnd
    Russer, Peter
    TIME DOMAIN METHODS IN ELECTRODYNAMICS: A TRIBUTE TO WOLFGANG J.R. HOEFER, 2008, 121 : 375 - 392
  • [35] Decomposition of Electromagnetic Interferences in the Time-Domain
    Azpurua, Marco A.
    Pous, Marc
    Silva, Ferran
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY, 2016, 58 (02) : 385 - 392
  • [36] Time-Domain Electromagnetic Leaky Waves
    Stumpf, Martin
    Gu, Junhong
    Lager, Ioan E.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 2023, 71 (04) : 3382 - 3392
  • [37] Progress in time-domain electromagnetic modelling
    Celuch-Marcysiak, M
    MIKON-98: 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MICROWAVES & RADAR, VOLS 1-4, 1998, : 327 - 334
  • [38] Measurement of electromagnetic interference in time-domain
    Braun, S.
    Frech, A.
    Russer, P.
    ADVANCES IN RADIO SCIENCE, 2008, 6 : 311 - 313
  • [39] TIME-DOMAIN MODELING IN ELECTROMAGNETICS
    MILLER, EK
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES AND APPLICATIONS, 1994, 8 (9-10) : 1125 - 1172
  • [40] Dispersive Finite-Difference Time-Domain Simulation of Electromagnetic Cloaking Structures
    Zhao, Yan
    Argyropoulos, Christos
    Hao, Yang
    2008 IEEE ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM, VOLS 1-9, 2008, : 1256 - 1259