Assessment of commercialization strategy using R&D capability

被引:6
作者
Lin, Chinho [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, JyunLin [1 ]
Wu, Ya-Jung [1 ,3 ]
Chang, ChiaChi [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Ind & Informat Management, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Inst Informat Management, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
[3] Kao Yuan Univ, Dept Int Business, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
Research and development; Competitive strategy; Patents; Business formation; TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS; VERTICAL INTEGRATION; PATENT CITATIONS; MULTIPLE INDICATORS; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; TRANSACTION COSTS; LOCAL SEARCH; MARKET VALUE; START-UPS; INNOVATION;
D O I
10.1108/02635571111118251
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present a cooperation model identifying the R&D capability as the central driver of startup commercialization strategy, by which new startups can evaluate their relative R&D capability and consequently choose an appropriate commercialization strategy. Design/methodology/approach - A cooperation model has been constructed, and drawing upon the patent data of 91 aluminum nitride manufacturers, the implications of R&D capability for commercialization strategy are illustrated. Findings - The authors' analysis suggests that competitive interaction between startup innovators and established firms depends on the R&D capability of the startup innovators, which can be evaluated by patent data. Practical implications - For technologically efficient firms, a high level of integration to achieve the benefits of economies of scope will lead to more profits. However, for technologically inefficient firms, maintaining a low level of integration to achieve the benefits of specialization is the better strategy. Originality/value - This paper provides a simplified model which combines an evaluation of R&D capability using patent data with strategic decision making to facilitate successful commercialization in startups.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 369
页数:29
相关论文
共 70 条
[21]   Value Creation Architectures and Competitive Advantage: LESSONS FROM THE EUROPEAN AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY [J].
Dietl, Helmut ;
Royer, Susanne ;
Stratmann, Uwe .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2009, 51 (03) :24-+
[22]   Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: Methodology and empirical application [J].
Dutta, S ;
Narasimhan, O ;
Rajiv, S .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (03) :277-285
[23]  
Eisenhardt KM, 2000, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V21, P1105, DOI 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO
[24]  
2-E
[25]   Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach [J].
Faems, D ;
Van Looy, B ;
Debackere, K .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2005, 22 (03) :238-250
[26]   Antecedents of cooperative commercialisation strategies of nanotechnology firms [J].
Fiedler, Marina ;
Welpe, Isabel M. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2010, 39 (03) :400-410
[27]  
Freeman C., 1997, The economics of industrial innovation, V3rd
[28]   The product market and the market for "ideas": commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs [J].
Gans, JS ;
Stern, S .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (02) :333-350
[29]   When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? [J].
Gans, JS ;
Hsu, DH ;
Stern, S .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2002, 33 (04) :571-586
[30]  
Griliches Z., 1998, RD PRODUCTIVITY ECON