Planning of complex supply chains: A performance comparison of three meta-heuristic algorithms

被引:34
作者
Fahimnia, Behnam [1 ]
Davarzani, Hoda [2 ]
Eshragh, Ali [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Business Sch, Inst Transport & Logist Studies, Darlington, NSW 2008, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Business Sch, Discipline Business Analyt, Darlington, NSW 2008, Australia
[3] Univ Newcastle, Sch Math & Phys Sci, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
关键词
Supply chain planning; Green supply chain management; Optimization; Meta-heuristics; Genetic Algorithm; Simulated Annealing; Cross-Entropy; Case study; CROSS-ENTROPY METHOD; GENETIC ALGORITHM; NETWORK DESIGN; HYBRID ALGORITHM; OPTIMIZATION; MANAGEMENT; MODEL; SYSTEM; LOGISTICS; LOCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cor.2015.10.008
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Businesses have more complex supply chains than ever before. Many supply chain planning efforts result in sizable and often nonlinear optimization problems that are difficult to solve using standard solution methods. Meta-heuristic and heuristic solution methods have been developed and applied to tackle such modeling complexities. This paper aims to compare and analyze the performance of three meta-heuristic algorithms in solving a nonlinear green supply chain planning problem. A tactical planning model is presented that aims to balance the economic and emissions performance of the supply chain. Utilizing data from an Australian clothing manufacturer, three meta-heuristic algorithms including Genetic Algorithm, Simulated Annealing and Cross-Entropy are adopted to find solutions to this problem. Discussions on the key characteristics of these algorithms and comparative analysis of the numerical results provide some modeling insights and practical implications. In particular, we find that (1) a Cross-Entropy method outperforms the two popular meta-heuristic algorithms in both computation time and solution quality, and (2) Simulated Annealing may produce better results in a time-restricted comparison due to its rapid initial convergence speed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 252
页数:12
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Application of the cross-entropy method to the buffer allocation problem in a simulation-based environment [J].
Alon, G ;
Kroese, DP ;
Raviv, T ;
Rubinstein, RY .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2005, 134 (01) :137-151
[2]   A genetic algorithm approach for multi-objective optimization of supply chain networks [J].
Altiparmak, Fulya ;
Gen, Mitsuo ;
Lin, Lin ;
Paksoy, Turan .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 51 (01) :196-215
[3]   A cross entropy approach to design of reliable networks [J].
Altiparmak, Fulya ;
Dengiz, Berna .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 199 (02) :542-552
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The Cross-Entropy Method
[5]  
[Anonymous], ADV AUTOMATION ROBOT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, NONLINEAR OPTICS TEL, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-08996-5
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ANN OPER RES, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10479-015-1936-Z
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1987, SIMULATED ANNEALING
[9]   An empirical comparison of Tabu Search, Simulated Annealing, and Genetic Algorithms for facilities location problems [J].
Arostegui, Marvin A., Jr. ;
Kadipasaoglu, Sukran N. ;
Khumawala, Basheer M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2006, 103 (02) :742-754
[10]   Use of genetic algorithms to solve production and operations management problems: a review [J].
Aytug, H ;
Khouja, M ;
Vergara, FE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2003, 41 (17) :3955-4009