Comparison of global inventories of CO emissions from biomass burning derived from remotely sensed data

被引:32
作者
Stroppiana, D. [1 ]
Brivio, P. A. [1 ]
Gregoire, J. -M. [2 ]
Liousse, C. [3 ]
Guillaume, B. [3 ]
Granier, C. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Mieville, A. [4 ]
Chin, M. [5 ]
Petron, G. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] CNR IREA, Milan, Italy
[2] European Commiss, JRC, IES, Global Environm Monitoring Unit GEM, Ispra, VA, Italy
[3] Lab Aerol, UMR 5560, Toulouse, France
[4] CNRS, Serv Aeron, Paris, France
[5] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[6] NOAA, Global Monitoring Div, Earth Syst Res Lab, Boulder, CO USA
[7] Univ Colorado, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
VEGETATION FIRE; INTERANNUAL VARIABILITY; HIGH-RESOLUTION; SATELLITE DATA; BURNED AREA; AFRICA; FOREST; CARBON; MOPITT; GASES;
D O I
10.5194/acp-10-12173-2010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We compare five global inventories of monthly CO emissions named VGT, ATSR, MODIS, GFED3 and MOPITT based on remotely sensed active fires and/or burned area products for the year 2003. The objective is to highlight similarities and differences by focusing on the geographical and temporal distribution and on the emissions for three broad land cover classes (forest, savanna/grassland and agriculture). Globally, CO emissions for the year 2003 range between 365 Tg CO (GFED3) and 1422 Tg CO (VGT). Despite the large uncertainty in the total amounts, some common spatial patterns typical of biomass burning can be identified in the boreal forests of Siberia, in agricultural areas of Eastern Europe and Russia and in savanna ecosystems of South America, Africa and Australia. Regionally, the largest difference in terms of total amounts (CV > 100%) and seasonality is observed at the northernmost latitudes, especially in North America and Siberia where VGT appears to overestimate the area affected by fires. On the contrary, Africa shows the best agreement both in terms of total annual amounts (CV = 31%) and of seasonality despite some overestimation of emissions from forest and agriculture observed in the MODIS inventory. In Africa VGT provides the most reliable seasonality. Looking at the broad land cover types, the range of contribution to the global emissions of CO is 64-74%, 23-32% and 3-4% for forest, savanna/grassland and agriculture, respectively. These results suggest that there is still large uncertainty in global estimates of emissions and it increases if the comparison is carried by out taking into account the temporal (month) and spatial (0.5 degrees x 0.5 degrees cell) dimensions. Besides the area affected by fires, also vegetation characteristics and conditions at the time of burning should also be accurately parameterized since they can greatly influence the global estimates of CO emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:12173 / 12189
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming
    Cherubini, Francesco
    Peters, Glen P.
    Berntsen, Terje
    Stromman, Anders H.
    Hertwich, Edgar
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2011, 3 (05): : 413 - 426
  • [22] Estimation of emissions from biomass burning in China (2003-2017) based on MODIS fire radiative energy data
    Yin, Lifei
    Du, Pin
    Zhang, Minsi
    Liu, Mingxu
    Xu, Tingting
    Song, Yu
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2019, 16 (07) : 1629 - 1640
  • [23] Comparison of remotely sensed and meteorological data-derived drought indices in mid-eastern China
    Zhou, Lei
    Zhang, Jie
    Wu, Jianjun
    Zhao, Lin
    Liu, Ming
    Lu, Aifeng
    Wu, Zhitao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 33 (06) : 1755 - 1779
  • [24] A framework for estimating forest disturbance intensity from successive remotely sensed biomass maps: Moving beyond average biomass loss estimates
    Hill T.C.
    Ryan C.M.
    Williams M.
    Carbon Balance and Management, 10 (1)
  • [25] Spatio-temporal characteristics of global atmospheric CO2 mole fractions (XCO2) retrieved from remotely sensed data
    Wang, Tianxing
    Shi, Jiancheng
    Jing, Yingying
    Xie, Yanhui
    INFRARED, MILLIMETER-WAVE, AND TERAHERTZ TECHNOLOGIES II, 2012, 8562
  • [26] Carbonaceous gas and aerosol emissions from biomass burning in China from 2012 to 2021
    Liu, Yongxiang
    Zhao, Hongmei
    Zhao, Guangying
    Zhang, Xuelei
    Xiu, Aijun
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 362
  • [27] Air Pollution Modeling from Remotely Sensed Data Using Regression Techniques
    Mozumder, Chitrini
    Reddy, K. Venkata
    Pratap, Deva
    JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 41 (02) : 269 - 277
  • [28] Trace gas and particle emissions from open biomass burning in Mexico
    Yokelson, R. J.
    Burling, I. R.
    Urbanski, S. P.
    Atlas, E. L.
    Adachi, K.
    Buseck, P. R.
    Wiedinmyer, C.
    Akagi, S. K.
    Toohey, D. W.
    Wold, C. E.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2011, 11 (14) : 6787 - 6808
  • [29] Global modeling analysis of tropospheric ozone and its radiative forcing from biomass burning emissions in the twentieth century
    Ito, Akinori
    Sudo, Kengo
    Akimoto, Hajime
    Sillman, Sanford
    Penner, Joyce E.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2007, 112 (D24)
  • [30] Estimationof carbon emissions from biomass burning based on parameters retrieved
    Wu Q.
    Chen F.
    Wang C.
    Li B.
    Wu W.
    Liu S.
    Xu F.
    Yaogan Xuebao/Journal of Remote Sensing, 2016, 20 (01): : 11 - 26