Regime resistance and accommodation: Toward a neo-Gramscian perspective on energy transitions

被引:61
作者
Ford, Adrian [1 ]
Newell, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Energy Transit Hub, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
[2] Univ Sussex, Sch Global Studies, Dept Int Relat, Brighton BN1 9SN, E Sussex, England
关键词
Energy transition; Gramsci; Hegemony; Resistance; Accommodation; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSITIONS; HISTORICAL INSTITUTIONALISM; SOCIOTECHNICAL TRANSITIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; OFFSHORE WIND; BIO-HEGEMONY; POWER; ELECTRICITY; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2021.102163
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Transition scholars are increasingly addressing questions of power and politics in their explanations of the direction and form of sustainability transitions. Drawing on insights from neo-Gramscian scholarship to enhance the conceptualisation of power in sustainability transitions, we develop a theoretical account of how combinations of incumbent actor resistance and accommodation contribute to regime stability and change. We use this to understand how incumbent firms and their industry organisations contribute to the (re)production of a sociotechnical regime by drawing on material, institutional and discursive forms of power to execute strategies of resistance and accommodation. This helps embellish understandings not only of the nature of the power of specific incumbent actors tied to a particular regime, but also of the operation of incumbency as a deeper system of power. We apply a neo-Gramscian lens to the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions: a lens comprised of multiple interrelated concepts, including hegemony, historical bloc, integral state, war of position, passive revolution and trasformismo, whose contributions we outline in turn.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 125 条
  • [11] Power in Transition An Interdisciplinary Framework to Study Power in Relation to Structural Change
    Avelino, Flor
    Rotmans, Jan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL THEORY, 2009, 12 (04) : 543 - 569
  • [12] The Political Economy of Energy Transitions: The Case of South Africa
    Baker, Lucy
    Newell, Peter
    Phillips, Jon
    [J]. NEW POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2014, 19 (06) : 791 - 818
  • [13] Energy materiality: A conceptual review of multi-disciplinary approaches
    Balmaceda, Margarita
    Hogselius, Per
    Johnson, Corey
    Pleines, Heiko
    Rogers, Douglas
    Tynkkynen, Veli-Pekka
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 56
  • [14] The Domestication of Open Government Data Advocacy in the United Kingdom: A Neo-Gramscian Analysis
    Bates, Jo
    [J]. POLICY AND INTERNET, 2013, 5 (01): : 118 - 137
  • [15] Beder S., 1997, GLOBAL SPIN CORPORAT
  • [16] Hidden carbon costs of the "everywhere war": Logistics, geopolitical ecology, and the carbon boot-print of the US military
    Belcher, Oliver
    Bigger, Patrick
    Neimark, Ben
    Kennelly, Cara
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF BRITISH GEOGRAPHERS, 2020, 45 (01) : 65 - 80
  • [17] . Discursive regime dynamics in the Dutch energy transition
    Bosman, Rick
    Loorbach, Derk
    Frantzeskaki, Niki
    Pistorius, Till
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2014, 13 : 45 - 59
  • [18] Shifting political power in an era of electricity decentralization: Rescaling, reorganization and battles for influence
    Brisbois, Marie Claire
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2020, 36 : 49 - 69
  • [19] Powershifts: A framework for assessing the growing impact of decentralized ownership of energy transitions on political decision-making
    Brisbois, Marie Claire
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 50 : 151 - 161
  • [20] Bromley S., 1991, AM HEGEMONY WORLD OI