Comparison of mecA polymerase chain reaction with phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

被引:47
作者
Baddour, M. M. [1 ]
AbuElKheir, M. M.
Fatani, A. J.
机构
[1] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] King Saud Univ, Dept Microbiol, Riyadh 11495, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Saud Univ, Dept Pharmacol, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00284-007-9015-6
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
In the present study, several conventional methods to detect methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) were compared with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of mecA gene-positive isolates. Cefoxitin E-test was also evaluated as a possible phenotypic method of MRSA detection. Oxacillin agar screen and PBP2' latex agglutination methods were found to be more sensitive than oxacillin and cefoxitin disk-diffusion methods. Cefoxitin disk diffusion was found to be the most specific. A combination of oxacillin agar screening with cefoxitin disk diffusion, or oxacillin disk diffusion with PBP2', improved sensitivity and specificity. Cefoxitin E-test with the current break points had low sensitivity and specificity (33.3% and 75%, respectively) for the detection of MRSA. However, changing the break points to <= 4 mu g/ml and to >= 6 mu g/ml for sensitive and resistant, respectively, greatly improved both. Changing the 30-mu g cefoxitin disk-diffusion break points to <= 21 mm for resistant slightly improved sensitivity but had no effect on specificity. It was therefore concluded that the use of more than one screening method is necessary to detect all MRSA isolates in clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 479
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
ABDO RA, 1996, LEBAN MED J, V44, P21
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V16, P105
[3]   Discrepancies between mecA PCR and conventional tests used for detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Araj, GF ;
Talhouk, RS ;
Simaan, CJ ;
Maasad, MJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 1999, 11 (01) :47-52
[4]   Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from major hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia [J].
Baddour, Manal M. ;
Abuelkheir, Manal M. ;
Fatani, Amal J. ;
Bohol, Marie F. ;
Al-Ahdal, Mohammad N. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 53 (08) :931-936
[5]   FACTORS AFFECTING METHICILLIN RESISTANCE IN STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS [J].
BERGERBACHI, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 1995, 6 (01) :13-21
[6]   Evaluation of a cefoxitin disk diffusion test for the routine detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Boubaker, IBB ;
Ben Abbes, R ;
Ben Abdallah, H ;
Mamlouk, K ;
Mahjoubi, F ;
Kammoun, A ;
Hammami, A ;
Ben Redjeb, S .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2004, 10 (08) :762-765
[7]   Evaluation of MRSA-screen, a simple anti-PBP 2a slide latex agglutination kit, for rapid detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus [J].
Cavassini, M ;
Wenger, A ;
Jaton, K ;
Blanc, DS ;
Bille, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 37 (05) :1591-1594
[8]   Methicillin resistance in staphylococci: Molecular and biochemical basis and clinical implications [J].
Chambers, HF .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1997, 10 (04) :781-+
[9]  
*CLIN LAB STAND I, 2004, 14 INF SUPPL
[10]  
COURVALIN P, 2006, ANTIBIOGRAMME, P671