Do prescription drug monitoring programs encourage prescription - or illicit - opioid abuse?

被引:15
|
作者
Meadowcroft, Devon [1 ]
Whitacre, Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Stil, OK USA
关键词
Prescription drug monitoring programs; opioid epidemic; heroin; fixed effects models; multiple correspondence analysis; panel data; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; HEROIN USE; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; UNITED-STATES; RISK-FACTORS; LAWS REDUCE; OVERDOSE; PAIN; IMPACT; DEATH;
D O I
10.1080/08897077.2019.1695707
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) are tools that states can use to fight prescription opioid misuse within their jurisdiction. However, because PDMPs make prescription opioids more difficult to access, these programs may have the unintended consequence of increasing deaths related to illicit opioids. Methods: This study uses fixed effects models to estimate how PDMP regulatory strength is associated with both prescription opioid- and heroin-related deaths between 1999 and 2016. PDMP regulatory strength is measured by creating a score using multiple correspondence analysis (MCA). Additional models replace the MCA score with a binary indicator for the presence of one particular regulation requiring physicians to access the system before writing opioid prescriptions. Results: Results show that continuous measures of PDMP strength are not generally associated with prescription opioid- or heroin-related death rates. Yet, one model does show that PDMP scores are positively associated with the heroin-related death rate. The models using the binary mandatory access variable show a strong positive association with both prescription opioid and heroin deaths. Conclusions: This study supports the theory that more stringent state PDMPs are associated with higher rates of heroin-related deaths, potentially due to decreases in prescription opioid availability.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 75
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How Do "Must-Access" Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs Address Opioid Misuse?
    Ukert, Benjamin
    Polsky, Daniel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2023, 9 (03) : 374 - 404
  • [22] Prescription Compliance or Illicit Designer Drug Abuse? Commentary
    Ganetsky, Michael
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2012, 58 (12) : 1634 - 1635
  • [23] PRESCRIPTION DRUG MONITORING PROGRAMS The Role of Asymmetric Information on Drug Availability and Abuse
    Meinhofer, Angelica
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2018, 4 (04) : 504 - 526
  • [24] Leveraging Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs to Evaluate Opioid Policy Interventions
    Weiner, S.
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 55 : 46 - 46
  • [25] Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs and Opioid Overdoses Exploring Sources of Heterogeneity
    Castillo-Carniglia, Alvaro
    Ponicki, William R.
    Gaidus, Andrew
    Gruenewald, Paul J.
    Marshall, Brandon D. L.
    Fink, David S.
    Martins, Silvia S.
    Rivera-Aguirre, Ariadne
    Wintemute, Garen J.
    Cerda, Magdalena
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 30 (02) : 212 - 220
  • [26] Features of prescription drug monitoring programs associated with reduced rates of prescription opioid-related poisonings
    Pauly, N. J.
    Slavova, S.
    Delcher, C.
    Freeman, P. R.
    Talbert, J.
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2018, 184 : 26 - 32
  • [27] Hassle Costs versus Information: How Do Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs Reduce Opioid Prescribing?
    Alpert, Abby
    Dykstra, Sarah
    Jacobson, Mireille
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2024, 16 (01) : 87 - 123
  • [28] The evolution of prescription drug monitoring programs
    Ashburn, Michael A.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 25 (07) : 852 - 853
  • [29] Privacy and Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs
    Vivian, Jesse C.
    US PHARMACIST, 2014, 39 (05) : 44 - 46
  • [30] Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs Reply
    Gugelmann, Hallam M.
    Perrone, Jeanmarie
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (09): : 912 - 913