Imaging artifacts of medical instruments in ultrasound-guided interventions

被引:65
作者
Huang, Jinlan
Triedman, John K.
Vasilyev, Nikolay V.
Suematsu, Yoshihiro
Cleveland, Robin E.
Dupont, Pierre E.
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Dept Aerosp & Mech Engn, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Div Basic Cardiovasc Res, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Tokyo, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
imaging artifacts; medical instruments; ultrasound-guided interventions;
D O I
10.7863/jum.2007.26.10.1303
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective. Real-time 3-dimensional (3D) ultrasound imaging has the potential to become a dominant imaging technique for minimally invasive surgery. One barrier to its widespread use is that surgical instruments generate imaging artifacts, which can obfuscate their location, orientation, and geometry and obscure nearby tissue. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe the types of artifacts which could be produced by metallic instruments during interventions guided by 3D ultrasound imaging. Methods. Three imaging studies were performed. First, imaging artifacts from stainless steel rods were identified in vitro and acoustically characterized. Second, 3 typical minimally invasive instruments were imaged (in vitro and in vivo), and their artifacts were analyzed. The third study compared the intensity of imaging artifacts (in vitro and in vivo) from stainless steel rods with rods composed of 3 different materials and stainless steel rods with roughened and coated surfaces. Results. For the stainless steel rods, all observed artifacts are described and illustrated, and their physical origins are explained. Artifacts from the 3 minimally invasive instruments are characterized with the use of the artifacts observed with the rods. Finally, it is shown that artifacts can be greatly reduced through the use of alternate materials or by surface modification. Conclusions. Instrument artifacts in 3D ultrasound images can be more confusing than those from the same instruments imaged in 2 dimensions. Real-time 3D ultrasound imaging can, however, be used effectively for in vivo imaging of minimally invasive instruments by using artifact mitigation techniques, including careful selection of probe and incision locations, as well as by instrument modification.
引用
收藏
页码:1303 / 1322
页数:20
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   ACOUSTIC SPECKLE - THEORY AND EXPERIMENTAL-ANALYSIS [J].
ABBOTT, JG ;
THURSTONE, FL .
ULTRASONIC IMAGING, 1979, 1 (04) :303-324
[2]   THE RING-DOWN ARTIFACT [J].
AVRUCH, L ;
COOPERBERG, PL .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 1985, 4 (01) :21-28
[3]  
Blackstock D. T., 2000, FUNDAMENTALS PHYS AC, P495
[4]  
BREKHOVSKIKH LM, 1990, ACOUSTICS LAYERED ME, P109
[5]   Mirror-image artifact mimicking epidural hematoma: Usefulness of power Doppler sonography [J].
Cakmakci, H ;
Gulcu, A ;
Zenger, MN .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2003, 31 (08) :437-439
[6]   The latest in ultrasound: three-dimensional imaging. Part II [J].
Campani, R ;
Bottinelli, O ;
Calliada, F ;
Coscia, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 27 :S183-S187
[7]  
Cannon Jeremy W, 2003, Comput Aided Surg, V8, P82, DOI 10.3109/10929080309146042
[8]   Relative ultrasonographic echogenicity of standard, dimpled, and polymeric-coated needles [J].
Culp, WC ;
McCowan, TC ;
Goertzen, TC ;
Habbe, TG ;
Hummel, MM ;
LeVeen, RF ;
Anderson, JC .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 11 (03) :351-358
[9]   DETECTION OF FOREIGN-BODIES IN SOFT-TISSUES - EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND XERORADIOGRAPHY [J].
DEFLAVIIS, L ;
SCAGLIONE, P ;
DELBO, P ;
NESSI, R .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1988, 28 (03) :400-404
[10]   Sonography: The undiscovered jewel of interventional radiology [J].
Dodd, GD ;
Esola, CC ;
Memel, DS ;
Ghiatas, A ;
Chintapalli, KN ;
Paulson, EK ;
Nelson, RC ;
Ferris, JV ;
Baron, RL .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1996, 16 (06) :1271-1288