Video Visits are Practical for the Follow-up and Management of Established Male Infertility Patients

被引:9
作者
Andino, Juan
Zhu, Alex
Chopra, Zoey
Daignault-Newton, Stephanie
Ellimoottil, Chad
Dupree, James M.
机构
[1] Michigan Med Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Inst Healthcare Policy & Innovat, Ann Arbor, MI USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
TELEMEDICINE; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2021.03.050
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To study the use of video visits for male infertility care prior to the COVID-19 pandemic METHODS We reviewed video visits for male infertility patients completed at a tertiary academic center in southeast Michigan. These patients had follow-up after an initial in-person evaluation. We designed this retrospective case series to describe the diagnostic categories seen through telehealth, management steps completed during video visits, and to understand whether additional in-person care was required within 90 days of video visits. In addition, we estimated time and cost savings for patients attributed to video visits. RESULTS Most men seen during video visits had an endocrinologic (29%) or anatomic (21%) cause for their infertility. 73% of video visits involved reviewing results; 30% included counseling regarding assistive reproductive technologies; and 25% of video visits resulted in prescribing hormonally active medications. The two patients (3%) who were seen in clinic after their video visit underwent a varicocelectomy in the interim. No patients required an unplanned in-person visit. From a patient perspective, video visits were estimated to save a median of 97 minutes (IQR 64-250) of travel per visit. Median cost savings per patient- by avoiding travel and taking time off work for a clinic visit-were estimated to range from $149 (half day off) to $252 (full day off). CONCLUSION Video visits for established male infertility patients were used to manage different causes of infertility while saving patients time and money. Telehealth for established patients did not trigger additional in-person evaluations. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 163
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2020, DIAGN TREATM INF MEN
  • [2] Andino JJ, 2020, UROLOGY, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.UROLOGY.2020.05.080
  • [3] Andino JJ, 2021, UROL PRACT, V8, P53, DOI [10.1097/upj.0000000000000149, 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000149]
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, PROCL DECL NAT EM NO
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, Fertility problems: assessment and treatment
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2020, PHYS OTH CLIN CMS FL
  • [7] ASRM, 2020, PAT MAN CLIN REC COR, P356, DOI [10.1097/01.ogx.0000666100.94243.bc, DOI 10.1097/01.OGX.0000666100.94243.BC]
  • [8] ASRM, SMRU STAT REG MAL RE
  • [9] Role of Telemedicine in Urology: Contemporary Practice Patterns and Future Directions
    Badalato, Gina M.
    Kaag, Matthew
    Lee, Richard
    Vora, Anup
    Burnett, Arthur
    [J]. UROLOGY PRACTICE, 2020, 7 (02) : 122 - 126
  • [10] Clinical implications of telemedicine for providers and patients
    Berg, William T.
    Goldstein, Marc
    Melnick, Alexis P.
    Rosenwaks, Zev
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (06) : 1129 - 1134