Unit commitment with flexible generating units

被引:81
作者
Lu, B [1 ]
Shahidehpour, M [1 ]
机构
[1] IIT, Elect Power & Power Elect Ctr, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
关键词
combined cycle units; emission limits; fuel switching/blending units; fuel types and prices; transmission flow constraints; unit commitment;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2004.840411
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
In today's volatile environment of restructured power markets, and with the passage of more stringent Clean Air Act Amendment of 1990, competitive generation units must have the ability for operating under flexible conditions to respond to various market driving forces. Among generating units with flexible operating conditions, those with fuel switching and fuel-blending capabilities, as well as combined cycle units, are commonly considered for responding to volatile market environments. For a detailed modeling of flexible operating conditions, we consider fuel types and limitations along with operating constraints such as unit configuration, min up/down time, ramping, generating capacity, and start-up characteristics, which could make unit commitment (UC) calculations even more cumbersome. In this paper, we consider network constraints in security-constrained unit commitment (SCUC). The SCUC problem is decomposed into two coordinated problems, based on Benders decomposition, which include a master problem for optimizing UC and a subproblem for minimizing network violations. We apply Lagrangian relaxation to UC for modeling various types of generation units. Several numerical examples demonstrate the impact of flexible generating units on power system operation and the potential impact of volatile fuel prices and network constraints on the performance of these units.
引用
收藏
页码:1022 / 1034
页数:13
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   A practical resource scheduling with OPF constraints [J].
AbdulRahman, KH ;
Shahidehpour, SM ;
Aganagic, M ;
Mokhtari, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1996, 11 (01) :254-259
[2]   Optimal response of a power generator to energy, AGC, and reserve pool-based markets [J].
Arroyo, JM ;
Conejo, AJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2002, 17 (02) :404-410
[3]  
BJELOGRLIC M, P 2000 IEEE PES SUMM, P189
[4]  
BLANKINSHIP S, 2003, COAL FIRED POWER GEN
[5]   Scheduling units with multiple operating modes in unit commitment [J].
Cohen, AI ;
Ostrowski, G .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1996, 11 (01) :497-503
[6]  
*EN INF ADM, 1997, DOEEIA058297
[7]  
FONTES R, 2003, POWER GEN INT C LAS
[8]  
Kehlhofer R, 1991, Combined-cycle gas and steam turbine power plants
[9]  
Lai SY, 1999, IEEE T POWER SYST, V14, P58, DOI 10.1109/59.744484
[10]   POTENTIAL IMPACTS OF CLEAN-AIR REGULATIONS ON SYSTEM OPERATIONS [J].
LE, KD ;
STANSBERRY, C ;
VICE, R ;
WOOD, JT ;
BALLANCE, J ;
BROWN, G ;
KAMYA, JY ;
NIELSEN, K ;
NAKAJIMA, H ;
IYODA, I ;
OOKUBO, M ;
CAULEY, G ;
GOLDEN, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1995, 10 (02) :647-654