Disparities in Female Pediatric, Adolescent and Young Adult Oncofertility: A Needs Assessment

被引:18
作者
Coker Appiah, Leslie [1 ,2 ]
Fei, Yueyang Frances [3 ]
Olsen, Mallery [4 ,5 ]
Lindheim, Steven R. [6 ,7 ]
Puccetti, Diane M. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Acad Specialists Obstet & Gynecol, Denver, CO 80045 USA
[2] Childrens Hosp Colorado, Pediat & Adolescent Gynecol, Denver, CO 80045 USA
[3] Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Pediat & Adolescent Gynecol, Columbus, OH 43205 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Dept Med, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[5] Amer Family Childrens Hosp, Pediat Hematol Oncol, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[6] Wright State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Dayton, OH 45409 USA
[7] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
关键词
adolescent and young adult; cancer; oncology; fertility; fertility preservation; disparities; access; oncofertility; reproductive health; ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE; CRYOPRESERVED OVARIAN TISSUE; BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS; ANTRAL FOLLICLE COUNT; FERTILITY PRESERVATION; CHILDHOOD-CANCER; EMBRYO CRYOPRESERVATION; HEALTH OUTCOMES; LETROZOLE; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.3390/cancers13215419
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary The following review addresses the effects of cancer and cancer treatments on fertility and reproductive health, and reviews standard and novel fertility preservation options. This article presents a needs assessment focusing on disparities in access to care for the pediatric, adolescent, and young adult (AYA) population to include cost, provider bias, inequitable referral patterns to reproductive specialists, and a lack of knowledge within the medical community regarding assisted reproductive technologies and reproductive health care in survivorship. The information presented in this article is targeted to oncologists, gynecologists, pediatric subspecialists, and primary care providers who care for this population and introduces areas for further research to address gaps in care and improve access for this population. Advancements in cancer screening and implementation of targeted treatments have significantly improved survival rates to 85% for pediatric and AYA survivors. Greater than 75% of survivors will live to experience the long-term adverse outcomes of cancer therapies, termed late effects (LE), that disrupt quality of life (QoL). Infertility and poor reproductive outcomes are significant disruptors of QoL in survivorship, affecting 12-88% of survivors who receive at-risk therapies. To mitigate risk, fertility preservation (FP) counseling is recommended as standard of care prior to gonadotoxic therapy. However, disparities in FP counseling, implementation of FP interventions, and screening for gynecologic late effects in survivorship persist. Barriers to care include a lack of provider and patient knowledge of the safety and breadth of current FP options, misconceptions about the duration of time required to implement FP therapies, cost, and health care team bias. Developing strategies to address barriers and implement established guidelines are necessary to ensure equity and improve quality of care across populations.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 98 条
  • [1] How can we improve oncofertility care for patients? A systematic scoping review of current international practice and models of care
    Anazodo, Antoinette
    Laws, Paula
    Logan, Shanna
    Saunders, Carla
    Travaglia, Jo
    Gerstl, Brigitte
    Bradford, Natalie
    Cohn, Richard
    Birdsall, Mary
    Barr, Ronald
    Suzuki, Nao
    Takae, Seido
    Marinho, Ricardo
    Xiao, Shuo
    Qiong-Hua, Chen
    Mahajan, Nalini
    Patil, Madhuri
    Gunasheela, Devika
    Smith, Kristen
    Sender, Leonard
    Melo, Claudia
    Almeida-Santos, Teresa
    Salama, Mahmoud
    Appiah, Leslie
    Su, Irene
    Lane, Sheila
    Woodruff, Teresa K.
    Pacey, Allan
    Anderson, Richard A.
    Shenfield, Francoise
    Ledger, William
    Sullivan, Elizabeth
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2019, 25 (02) : 159 - 179
  • [2] The Clinical Value and Interpretation of Anti-Mullerian Hormone in Women With Cancer
    Anderson, Richard A.
    Su, H. Irene
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [3] The impact of cancer on subsequent chance of pregnancy: a population-based analysis
    Anderson, Richard A.
    Brewster, David H.
    Wood, Rachael
    Nowell, Sian
    Fischbacher, Colin
    Kelsey, Tom W.
    Wallace, W. Hamish B.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 33 (07) : 1281 - 1290
  • [4] Pretreatment anti-Mullerian hormone predicts for loss of ovarian function after chemotherapy for early breast cancer
    Anderson, Richard A.
    Rosendahl, Mikkel
    Kelsey, Thomas W.
    Cameron, David A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (16) : 3404 - 3411
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2021, Surveillance Epidemiology of Coronavirus (COVID-19) Under Research Exclusion (SECURE)-CIRRHOSIS Registry, Updates and Data
  • [6] Ethical Quandaries in Gamete-Embryo Cryopreservation Related to Oncofertility
    Ayensu-Coker, Leslie
    Essig, Ellen
    Breech, Lesley L.
    Lindheim, Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS, 2013, 41 (03) : 711 - 719
  • [7] Association between fertility drugs and gynecologic cancers, breast cancer, and childhood cancers
    Ayhan, A
    Salman, MC
    Celik, H
    Dursun, P
    Ozyuncu, O
    Gultekin, M
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 83 (12) : 1104 - 1111
  • [8] Letrozole for ovulation induction and fertility preservation by embryo cryopreservation in young women with endometrial carcinoma
    Azim, Amr
    Oktay, Kutluk
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 88 (03) : 657 - 664
  • [9] Safety of fertility preservation by ovarian stimulation with letrozole and Gonadotropins in patients with breast cancer: A prospective controlled study
    Azim, Amr A.
    Costantini-Ferrando, Maria
    Oktay, Kutluk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (16) : 2630 - 2635
  • [10] Characterization of ovarian follicular wave dynamics in women
    Baerwald, AR
    Adams, GP
    Pierson, RA
    [J]. BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2003, 69 (03) : 1023 - 1031