Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures

被引:434
作者
de Looze, MP
Kuijt-Evers, LFM
van Dieën, J
机构
[1] TNO Work & Employment, NL-2130 AS Hoofddorp, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Human Movement Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
comfort; discomfort; sitting; pressure distribution;
D O I
10.1080/0014013031000121977
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The concepts of comfort and discomfort in sitting are under debate. There is no widely accepted definition, although it is beyond dispute that comfort and discomfort are feelings or emotions that are subjective in nature. Yet, beside several subjective methodologies, several objective methods ( e. g. posture analysis, pressure measurements, electromyography (EMG) are in use to assess sitting comfort or discomfort. In the current paper a theoretical framework is presented, in which comfort and discomfort were defined and the hypothetical associations with underlying factors were indicated. Next, the literature was reviewed to determine the relationships between objective measures and subjective ratings of comfort and discomfort. Twenty-one studies were found in which simultaneous measures of an objective parameter and a subjective rating of comfort or discomfort were obtained. Pressure distribution appears to be the objective measure with the most clear association with the subjective ratings. For other variables, regarding spinal pro. le or muscle activity for instance, the reported associations are less clear and usually not statistically significant.
引用
收藏
页码:985 / 997
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Subjective rating scales: science or art?
    Annett, J
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2002, 45 (14) : 966 - 987
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1991, Int. J. Ind. Ergon, DOI DOI 10.1016/0169-8141(91)90028-K
  • [3] A CONCEPTUAL-MODEL FOR WORK-RELATED NECK AND UPPER-LIMB MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
    ARMSTRONG, TJ
    BUCKLE, P
    FINE, LJ
    HAGBERG, M
    JONSSON, B
    KILBOM, A
    KUORINKA, IAA
    SILVERSTEIN, BA
    SJOGAARD, G
    VIIKARIJUNTURA, ERA
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1993, 19 (02) : 73 - 84
  • [4] COMPARISON OF OFFICE CHAIRS WITH FIXED FORWARDS OR BACKWARDS INCLINING, OR TILTABLE SEATS
    BENDIX, T
    WINKEL, J
    JESSEN, F
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 54 (04): : 378 - 385
  • [5] BEHAVIOUR, BODY MECHANICS AND DISCOMFORT
    BRANTON, P
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 1969, 12 (02) : 316 - &
  • [6] EVALUATION OF SPINAL LOADS AND CHAIR DESIGN IN SEATED WORK TASKS
    EKLUND, JAE
    CORLETT, EN
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1987, 2 (01) : 27 - 33
  • [7] ANATOMICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES IN CHAIR AND TABLE DESIGN
    FLOYD, WF
    ROBERTS, DF
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 1958, 2 (1-4) : 1 - 16
  • [8] Graf M., 1993, INT J IND ERGONOM, V12, P91, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0169-8141(93)90041-B, 10.1016/0169-8141(93)90041-B, 10.1016/0169-8141]
  • [9] Field studies of comfort and discomfort in sitting
    Helander, MG
    Zhang, LJ
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 1997, 40 (09) : 895 - 915
  • [10] Herzberg HTE, 1958, ANNOTATED BIBLIO APP, P297