We investigate whether the effect of liquidity on equity returns can be attributed to the liquidity level, as a stock characteristic, or a market wide systematic liquidity risk. We develop a CAPM liquidity-augmented risk model and test the characteristic hypothesis against the systematic risk hypothesis for the liquidity effect. We find that the two-factor systematic risk model explains the liquidity premium and the null hypothesis that the liquidity characteristic is compensated irrespective of liquidity risk loadings is rejected. This result is robust over 1931-2008 data and sub-samples of pre-1963 and post-1963 data both in the time-series and the cross-sectional analysis. Our findings provide clear guidance on the impact of liquidity on expected returns and can have practical implications in portfolio construction and investment strategies. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机构:
Hunan Univ Technol & Business, Sch Finance, Changsha, Peoples R ChinaHunan Univ Technol & Business, Sch Finance, Changsha, Peoples R China
Dong, Liang
Yu, Bo
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
City Univ Macau, Fac Finance, Taipa, Macau, Peoples R China
City Univ Macau, Fac Finance, Ave Padre Tomas Pereira Taipa, Taipa, Macau, Peoples R ChinaHunan Univ Technol & Business, Sch Finance, Changsha, Peoples R China
Yu, Bo
Qin, Zhenjiang
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Macau, Dept Finance & Business Econ, Fac Business Adm, Taipa, Macau, Peoples R ChinaHunan Univ Technol & Business, Sch Finance, Changsha, Peoples R China
Qin, Zhenjiang
Lam, Keith S. K.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Macau, Dept Finance & Business Econ, Fac Business Adm, Taipa, Macau, Peoples R ChinaHunan Univ Technol & Business, Sch Finance, Changsha, Peoples R China