Socio-economic Considerations in Biosafety and Biotechnology Decision Making: The Cartagena Protocol and National Biosafety Frameworks

被引:16
作者
Falck-Zepeda, Jose Benjamin
Zambrano, Patricia
机构
关键词
genetically engineered crops; biotechnology; biosafety; socio-economics; impact assessment; Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety; developing countries;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-1338.2011.00488.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Article 26.1 of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety left open the possibility for member countries to include in their biosafety regulatory processes the assessment of socio-economic considerations. Countries may also decide to include such assessments as part of their national legislation or regulations for the approval and deliberate release into the environment of genetically engineered technologies. Countries are debating if and how to implement assessment of socio-economic considerations. This paper contributes to the ongoing policy dialogue by discussing issues related to socio-economic assessment including scope, timing, inclusion modalities, methods, decision-making rules and standards, and the integration of socio-economic assessments in biosafety and/or biotechnology approval processes. This paper also discusses the implications of such inclusion for technology flows and public and private sector R&D. If inclusion is not done properly, it may negatively impact technology flows especially from the public sector and render an unworkable biosafety system.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 195
页数:25
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] *AFR UN, 2008, REV AFR UN MOD LAW B
  • [2] Alston J.M., 1995, Science under Scarcity: Principles and Practice for Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2003, US GEN MOD CROPS DEV
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2004, EPTD DISCUSSION PAPE
  • [5] Bayer J. C., 2010, AgBioForum, V13, P53
  • [6] ASILOMAR CONFERENCE ON RECOMBINANT DNA-MOLECULES
    BERG, P
    BALTIMORE, D
    BRENNER, S
    ROBLIN, RO
    SINGER, MF
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1975, 188 (4192) : 991 - 994
  • [7] COGEM (Commissie Genetishe Modificatie), 2009, CGM09092901 COGEM
  • [8] Poorer nations turn to publicly developed GM crops
    Cohen, JI
    [J]. NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2005, 23 (01) : 27 - 33
  • [9] Falck-Zepeda J. B., 2009, AgBioForum, V12, P90
  • [10] Surplus distribution from the introduction of a biotechnology innovation
    Falck-Zepeda, JB
    Traxler, G
    Nelson, RG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 82 (02) : 360 - 369