Lack of environmental enrichments in shelters for homeless animals: Animal welfare and human perception of animals' need

被引:1
|
作者
Mamzer, Hanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza Poznaniu, Wydzial Nauk Spolecznych, Instytut Socjol, Ul Szamarzewskiego 89, PL-60568 Poznan, Poland
来源
MEDYCYNA WETERYNARYJNA-VETERINARY MEDICINE-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE | 2020年 / 76卷 / 05期
关键词
environmental enrichment; animal shelter; animal welfare;
D O I
10.21521/mw.6358
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The more social and intelligent an animal is, the more stimuli it needs for optimal welfare. Animal welfare is based on complex interactions between somatic, psychological and social stimuli that fulfill animals' needs at various levels. This is also true of dogs - the species that was domesticated first due to its extensive social and communicative skills as well as cognitive capabilities. In view of these facts, it is difficult to explain why Polish law does not require animal shelters to provide dogs with environmental and social enrichments. Environmental enrichments are required by law for animals used in scientific experiments, for animals kept in zoos and for farm animals in industrial farming, but not for companion species kept in shelters. This is even more surprising considering that homeless animals spend long years in shelters, while the other categories of animals mentioned above may, according to their use, live much shorter lives. What are the consequences of this undesirable situation for animals in shelters and for society, and how can it be changed?
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 281
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Statement on the use of animal-based measures to assess the welfare of animals EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)
    Botner, Anette
    Broom, Donald
    Doherr, Marcus G.
    Domingo, Mariano
    Hartung, Jorg
    Keeling, Linda
    Koenen, Frank
    More, Simon
    Morton, David
    Oltenacu, Pascal
    Salati, Fulvio
    Salman, Mo
    Sanaa, Moez
    Sharp, James M.
    Stegeman, Jan A.
    Szucs, Endre
    Thulke, Hans-H.
    Vannier, Philippe
    Webster, John
    Wierup, Martin
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2012, 10 (06)
  • [32] Four types of activities that affect animals: implications for animal welfare science and animal ethics philosophy
    Fraser, D.
    MacRae, A. M.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2011, 20 (04) : 581 - 590
  • [34] Alteration of the Order on Animal Welfare in farmed Animals Sections: hen and pig husbandry
    Baumgarte, J.
    Dayen, M.
    Hies, J.
    Petermann, S.
    Maiworm, K.
    DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2007, 114 (04): : 149 - 152
  • [36] Legal Frameworks and Controls for the Protection of Research Animals: A Focus on the Animal Welfare Body with a French Case Study
    Codecasa, Elisa
    Pageat, Patrick
    Marcet-Rius, Miriam
    Cozzi, Alessandro
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (03): : 1 - 16
  • [37] Be Gentle to Them: Animal Welfare and the Protection of Draft Animals in the Ottoman Fatwa Literature and Legislation
    Kizilkaya, Necmettin
    RELIGIONS, 2020, 11 (10) : 1 - 14
  • [38] What Can Laboratory Animal Facility Managers Do to Improve the Welfare of Laboratory Animals and Laboratory Animal Facility Staff? A German Perspective
    von der Beck, Birte
    Wissmann, Andreas
    Tolba, Rene H.
    Dammann, Philip
    Hilken, Gero
    ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (07):
  • [39] Applying the OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code to the welfare of animals exported from Australia
    Schipp, M. A.
    Sheridan, A. D.
    REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2013, 32 (03): : 669 - 683
  • [40] Demographics Regarding Belief in Non-Human Animal Sentience and Emotional Empathy with Animals: A Pilot Study among Attendees of an Animal Welfare Symposium
    Cornish, Amelia
    Wilson, Bethany
    Raubenheimer, David
    McGreevy, Paul
    ANIMALS, 2018, 8 (10):