共 50 条
Home-based transcranial direct current stimulation in dual active treatments for symptoms of depression and anxiety: A case series
被引:5
|作者:
Sobral, Monica
[1
,2
]
Guiomar, Raquel
[1
]
Martins, Vera
[2
,3
]
Ganho-Avila, Ana
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Coimbra, Fac Psychol & Educ Sci, Ctr Res Neuropsychol & Cognit Behav Intervent, Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Neuroncircuit e Stim Clin Saude Mental, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Coimbra Hosp & Univ Ctr, Coimbra, Portugal
来源:
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
|
2022年
/
13卷
关键词:
tDCS;
home-based;
Flow;
anxiety;
depression;
case series;
NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION;
CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE;
RATING-SCALE;
TDCS;
INTERVENTIONS;
DISORDER;
BDNF;
EPISODE;
VERSION;
BDI;
D O I:
10.3389/fpsyt.2022.947435
中图分类号:
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号:
100205 ;
摘要:
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a potential treatment strategy across some psychiatric conditions. However, there is high heterogeneity in tDCS efficacy as a stand-alone treatment. To increase its therapeutic potential, researchers have begun to explore the efficacy of combining tDCS with psychological and pharmacological interventions. The current case series details the effect of 6-10 weeks of self-administered tDCS paired with a behavioral therapy smartphone app (Flow (TM)), on depressive and anxiety symptoms, in seven patients (26-51 years old; four female) presenting distinctive psychiatric disorders (major depression, dysthymia, illness anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and anxiety disorders). tDCS protocol consisted of an acute phase of daily 30 min sessions, across 10 workdays (2 weeks Monday-to-Friday; Protocol 1) or 15 workdays (3 weeks Monday-to-Friday; Protocol 2). A maintenance phase followed, with twice-weekly sessions for 4 or 3 weeks, corresponding to 18 or 21 sessions in total (Protocol 1 or 2, respectively). The Flow tDCS device uses a 2 mA current intensity, targeting the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The Flow app offers virtually guided behavioral therapy courses to be completed during stimulation. We assessed depressive symptoms using MADRS-S and BDI-II, anxious symptoms using STAI-Trait, acceptability using ACCEPT-tDCS, and side effects using the Adverse Effects Questionnaire, at baseline and week 6 of treatment. Six patients underwent simultaneous cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy and two were on antidepressants and benzodiazepines. According to the Reliable Change Index (RCI), for depressive symptoms, we found clinically reliable improvement in five patients using MADRS-S (out of seven; RCI: -1.45, 80% CI; RCI: -2.17 to -4.82, 95% CI; percentage change: 37.9-66.7%) and in four patients using BDI-II (out of five; RCI: -3.61 to -6.70, 95% CI; percentage change: 57.1-100%). For anxiety symptoms, clinically reliable improvement was observed in five patients (out of six; RCI: -1.79, 90% CI; RCI: -2.55 to -8.64, 95% CI; percentage change: 12.3-46.4%). Stimulation was well-tolerated and accepted, with mild tingling sensation and scalp discomfort being the most common side effects. This case series highlights the applicability, acceptability, and promising results when combining home-based tDCS with psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy to manage depression and anxiety symptoms in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文