Psychometric Analysis and Qualitative Review of an Outpatient Radiology-Specific Patient Satisfaction Survey: A Call for Collaboration in Validating a Survey Instrument

被引:7
作者
Dibble, Elizabeth H. [1 ,2 ]
Baird, Grayson L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Swenson, David W. [1 ,2 ]
Healey, Terrance T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Warren Alpert Med Sch, 3rd Floor,Main Bldg,593 Eddy St, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[2] Rhode Isl Hosp, 3rd Floor,Main Bldg,593 Eddy St, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[3] Brown Univ, Biostat Core, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI 02903 USA
关键词
Patient experience; survey development; quality care; practice management; CENTERS; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacr.2017.04.008
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to perform a psychometric analysis of the constructs and reliability of an outpatient radiology specific patient satisfaction survey and identify factors that drive patient experience so that radiology practices can improve the quality of their diagnostic imaging services. Methods: This retrospective study examined responses to eight patient satisfaction questions from a survey originally developed by a nascent marketing team and then administered at five outpatient imaging centers from January 7, 2013, to November 11, 2015. Patients' responses were reviewed to identify factors that affected patient experience, and a psychometric analysis of the survey instrument itself was performed, including exploratory factor analyses and reliability testing. Patient responses were compared among sites, examination types, and questions. Free-text comments were qualitatively categorized and compared by examination type. Results: In total, 6,512 surveys were completed among 137,059 patient encounters. Using exploratory factor analyses of the eight survey questions, three relevant patient experience constructs were derived: (1) front office experience, (2) intake experience, and (3) examination experience. Overall, good scale reliability was observed. Perceived quality of care had the most positive ratings; wait time had the most nonpositive ratings. Of 2,024 free-text comments, 1,859 were positive (most pertaining to staff), and 155 were negative (most pertaining to convenience). MRI patients were most likely to share negative comments, typically regarding the examination experience itself. Conclusions: Psychometric analysis of a patient survey derived three core patient experience constructs: front office experience, intake experience, and examination experience. The survey indicates the need to decrease wait times, streamline the registration process, and improve patient comfort during MRI examinations. Copyright (C) 2017 American College of Radiology
引用
收藏
页码:1291 / 1297
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2001, CROSS QUAL CHASM NEW
  • [2] Creating a Patient-Centered Imaging Service: Determining What Patients Want
    Basu, Pat A.
    Ruiz-Wibbelsmann, Julie A.
    Spielman, Susan B.
    Van Dalsem, Volney F., III
    Rosenberg, Jarrett K.
    Glazer, Gary M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (03) : 605 - 610
  • [3] What 'Patient-Centered' Should Mean: Confessions Of An Extremist
    Berwick, Donald M.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2009, 28 (04) : W555 - W565
  • [4] Electronic Kiosks for Patient Satisfaction Survey in Radiology
    Boos, Johannes
    Fang, Jieming
    Snell, Aideen
    Hallett, Donna
    Siewert, Bettina
    Eisenberg, Roland L.
    Brook, Olga R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 208 (03) : 577 - 584
  • [5] Accessing primary care: a simulated patient study
    Campbell, John L.
    Carter, Mary
    Davey, Antoinette
    Roberts, Martin J.
    Elliott, Marc N.
    Roland, Martin
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2013, 63 (608) : E171 - E176
  • [6] Patient satisfaction instruments used at academic medical centers: Results of a survey
    Dawn, AG
    Lee, PP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2003, 18 (06) : 265 - 269
  • [7] Factors Influencing Patients' Perspectives of Radiology Imaging Centers: Evaluation Using an Online Social Media Ratings Website
    Doshi, Ankur M.
    Somberg, Molly
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (02) : 210 - 216
  • [8] Imaging 3.0: What Is It?
    Ellenbogen, Paul H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 10 (04) : 229 - 229
  • [9] A Systemic Approach to Containing Health Care Spending
    Emanuel, Ezekiel
    Tanden, Neera
    Altman, Stuart
    Armstrong, Scott
    Berwick, Donald
    de Brantes, Francois
    Calsyn, Maura
    Chernew, Michael
    Colmers, John
    Cutler, David
    Daschle, Tom
    Egerman, Paul
    Kocher, Bob
    Milstein, Arnold
    Lee, Emily Oshima
    Podesta, John D.
    Reinhardt, Uwe
    Rosenthal, Meredith
    Sharfstein, Joshua
    Shortell, Stephen
    Stern, Andrew
    Orszag, Peter R.
    Spiro, Topher
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (10) : 949 - 954
  • [10] Shorter Perceived Outpatient MRI Wait Times Associated With Higher Patient Satisfaction
    Holbrook, Anna
    Glenn, Harold, Jr.
    Mahmood, Rabia
    Cai, Qingpo
    Kang, Jian
    Duszak, Richard, Jr.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (05) : 505 - 509