Realist research to inform pharmacy practice and policy

被引:4
作者
Luetsch, Karen [1 ,4 ]
Maidment, Ian [2 ]
Twigg, Michael [3 ]
Rowett, Debra [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Pharm, 20 Cornwall St, Woolloongabba, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] Aston Univ, Coll Hlth & Life Sci, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ East Anglia, Sch Pharm, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[4] Univ South Australia, Sch Pharm & Med Sci, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
关键词
Realist; Research; Pharmacy; Healthcare; Methods;
D O I
10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.06.026
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Theory-driven implementation and evaluation of pharmacy services can enhance their contribution to overall healthcare. As complex interventions most pharmacy practice programmes and services will be adopted and modified during their implementation into various healthcare contexts and systems. Realist approaches to theory-driven evaluation consider these variations in programmes, interventions and the contexts of their implementation and establish theories on how they work best, for whom and why. This paper illustrates the practical application of the realist philosophy of science to pharmacy practice relevant areas of healthcare using two case studies, a realist synthesis of existing literature on medication reviews and a realist review and evaluation related to medicines management. Applying realist logic establishes causative explanations of what could be essential factors in the success of programmes, enabling policy makers in their decision-making and pharmacy practice researchers as well as practitioners in optimising service design.
引用
收藏
页码:2075 / 2081
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, EVIDENCE BASED POLIC
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, BIOL CONSERV
  • [3] Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in Evaluation
    Astbury, Brad
    Leeuw, Frans L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2010, 31 (03) : 363 - 381
  • [4] An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist
    Mark S. Bauer
    Laura Damschroder
    Hildi Hagedorn
    Jeffrey Smith
    Amy M. Kilbourne
    [J]. BMC Psychology, 3 (1)
  • [5] Booth A., 2018, Doing Realist Research, DOI [10.4135/9781526451729, DOI 10.4135/9781526451729]
  • [6] Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance
    Craig, Peter
    Dieppe, Paul
    Macintyre, Sally
    Michie, Susan
    Nazareth, Irwin
    Petticrew, Mark
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7676): : 979 - 983
  • [7] Sustainability of innovations in healthcare: A systematic review and conceptual framework for professional pharmacy services
    Crespo-Gonzalez, Carmen
    Benrimoj, Shalom, I
    Scerri, Moira
    Garcia-Cardenas, Victoria
    [J]. RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2020, 16 (10) : 1331 - 1343
  • [8] Advancing pharmacy practice through implementation science
    Curran, Geoffrey M.
    Shoemaker, Sarah J.
    [J]. RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2017, 13 (05) : 889 - 891
  • [9] What's in a mechanism? Development of a key concept in realist evaluation
    Dalkin, Sonia Michelle
    Greenhalgh, Joanne
    Jones, Diana
    Cunningham, Bill
    Lhussier, Monique
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2015, 10
  • [10] Studying complexity in health services research: desperately seeking an overdue paradigm shift
    Greenhalgh, Trisha
    Papoutsi, Chrysanthi
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2018, 16