Multi-objective optimization of a dual energy-driven solid oxide fuel cell-based power plant

被引:43
|
作者
Cao, Yan [1 ]
Dhahad, Hayder A. [2 ]
Hussen, Hasanen M. [2 ]
Anqi, Ali E. [3 ]
Farouk, Naeim [4 ,5 ]
Parikhani, Towhid [6 ]
机构
[1] Xian Technol Univ, Sch Mechatron Engn, Xian 710021, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Technol Baghdad, Mech Engn Dept, Baghdad, Iraq
[3] King Khalid Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Coll Engn, Abha 61421, Saudi Arabia
[4] Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Univ, Mech Engn Dept, Coll Engn, Alkharj 16273, Saudi Arabia
[5] Red Sea Univ Port Sudan, Mech Engn Dept, Fac Engn, Port Sudan, Sudan
[6] Univ Mohaghegh Ardabili, Dept Mech Engn, Fac Engn, Ardebil, Iran
关键词
Solid Oxide Fuel Cell; Exergo-economic; Liquefied Natural Gas; Geothermal Energy; Genetic Algorithm; Multi-objective Optimization; GEOTHERMAL HEAT-SOURCE; MULTIGENERATION SYSTEM; EXERGOECONOMIC OPTIMIZATION; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117434
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Regarding the ability of solid oxide fuel cell-based energy conversion systems and modifying their design structure, the current study comprehensively investigates the potential of empowering a novel integrated solid oxide fuel cell-based power plant via liquefied natural gas together with geothermal energy, addressing this matter. Likewise, the newly designed system embraces an efficient design through multi-heat recovery based on two energy sources. In this regard, the sensitivity analysis and optimization (using a genetic algorithm) methods are utilized to assess the proposed system, taking into account the energy, exergy, exergo-economic, and environmental perspectives. The results indicate that as the current density of the cell increases, the net output power and energy efficiency of the system enhance. Among considered decision variables, geothermal water temperature and turbine pressure have the severest impacts on the output power and the corresponding unit cost. Moreover, optimization results reveal that the air heat exchanger and turbine have the highest exergy destruction costs with values of 4800 $/year and 4500 $/year, respectively. Furthermore, it is found that the emissions' cost (0.000154 $/s) would be around 2% lower when the system is optimized by minimizing unit product cost rather than maximizing the energy or exergy efficiency of the system.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and environmental analyses and multi-objective optimization of a biomass-to-energy integrated thermal power plant
    He, Fan
    Liu, Xiaoyu
    Wang, Meitao
    Zhou, Shuang
    Heydarian, Dariush
    ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 61 (07) : 5629 - 5648
  • [42] Thermodynamic analysis and multi-objective optimization performance of solid oxide fuel cell-Ericsson heat engine-reverse osmosis desalination
    Shakouri, Omolbanin
    Assad, Mamdouh El Haj
    Acikkalp, Emin
    JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2021, 145 (03) : 1075 - 1090
  • [43] Optimization of an HT-PEM fuel cell based residential micro combined heat and power system: A multi-objective approach
    Mamaghani, Alireza Haghighat
    Najafi, Behzad
    Casalegno, Andrea
    Rinaldi, Fabio
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 180 : 126 - 138
  • [44] Multi-objective optimization and dynamic characteristic analysis of solid oxide fuel cell- Supercritical carbon dioxide brayton cycle hybrid system
    Wang, Di
    Zhang, Yuxin
    Sun, Lingfang
    Han, Xinrui
    Zhou, Yunlong
    Wang, Yanhong
    Sun, Lu
    ENERGY, 2024, 313
  • [45] Performance enhancement of solar tower power plant: A multi-objective optimization approach
    Awan, Ahmed Bilal
    Mouli, Kotturu V. V. Chandra
    Zubair, Muhammad
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 225
  • [46] Evaluation and multi-objective salp swarm optimization of a new solid oxide fuel cell hybrid system integrated with an alkali metal thermal electric converter/absorption power cycle
    Mokri, Ava
    Noorpoor, Arshiya
    Boyaghchi, Fateme Ahmadi
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2023, 176 : 797 - 816
  • [47] Comparative analysis and multi-objective optimization of hydrogen liquefaction process using either organic Rankine or absorption power cycles driven by dual-source biomass fuel and geothermal energy
    Meng, Yue
    Wu, Haoyue
    Zheng, Yuhang
    Wang, Kunpeng
    Duan, Yinying
    ENERGY, 2022, 253
  • [48] Multi-objective optimization of Binary Flashing Cycle (BFC) driven by geothermal energy
    Wang, Lingbao
    Li, Huashan
    Bu, Xianbiao
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 166
  • [49] Multi-objective Optimization of Channel Geometry for A Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell
    Xie, Qinglin
    Huang, Yuewu
    CLEANER ENERGY FOR CLEANER CITIES, 2018, 152 : 889 - 894
  • [50] 4E analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel multi-generating cycle based on waste heat recovery from solid oxide fuel cell fed by biomass
    Mishamandani, Arian Shabruhi
    Nejad, Amir Qatarani
    Shabani, Najmeh
    Ahmadi, Gholamreza
    RENEWABLE ENERGY FOCUS, 2024, 50