Ventral epidural steroid injection with catheter techniques for radicular pain patients: A prospective observational study

被引:0
作者
Chumnanvej, Sorayouth [1 ]
Yosthornsawasdi, Karn [1 ]
Chumnanvej, Siriluk [2 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Ramathibodi Hosp, Fac Med, Neurosurg Div,Dept Surg, 270 Rama VI Rd, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
[2] Phramongkutklao Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Operating Room, Bangkok, Thailand
来源
INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY-ADVANCED TECHNIQUES AND CASE MANAGEMENT | 2019年 / 18卷
关键词
Epidural; Back pain; Leg pain; Steroid injection; LOW-BACK-PAIN; SPINAL PAIN; SAFETY; VOLUME; COSTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.inat.2019.100511
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim Using the controllable caudal catheter (CCC) is the other option for ventral epidural steroid injection. This study determined the pain reduction result by CCC in leg pain patients who were poor surgical candidates. Material and methods: Sixty nine cases were met inclusion criteria. Visual Analog Scale score and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire of two groups were determined at 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. Mixed linear regression model was applied to compare Visual Analog Scale score and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire between two groups. Results: Overall mean Roland Morris Disability for CCC and Transforaminal selective nerve root block (TF-SNRB) are 0.68 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.78) and 0.50 (95% CI: 0.42, 0.59), respectively. Overall mean Visual Analog Scale score for CCC and TF-SNRB are 3.77 (95% CI: 3.04, 4.51) and 3.65 (3.04, 4.26), respectively. Comparing between two groups, the coefficient of Roland Morris Disability and Visual Analog Scale score were -0.173 (95% CI: -0.314, -0.031) and -0.123 (95% CI: -1.148, 0.901), respectively. Conclusion: The pain reduction result by CCC was comparable with TF-SNRB in early follow-up. They are also useful for patients who are not candidates for surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Bicket MC, 2015, PAIN MANAG, V5, P129, DOI [10.2217/pmt.14.53, 10.2217/PMT.14.53]
  • [2] Epidural injections in prevention of surgery for spinal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Bicket, Mark C.
    Horowitz, Joshua M.
    Benzon, Honorio T.
    Cohen, Steven P.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (02) : 348 - 362
  • [3] Bombardier C, 2001, J RHEUMATOL, V28, P431
  • [4] Chun EH, 2015, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V18, P519
  • [5] Single Versus Two-Level Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection for Treating Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: What is the Evidence? Response
    Furman, Michael B.
    Weber, Nicholas H.
    [J]. PM&R, 2015, 7 (08) : 885 - 886
  • [6] Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Injections of Particulate and Nonparticulate Corticosteroids for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain
    Denis, Isabelle
    Claveau, Genevieve
    Filiatrault, Marc
    Fugere, Francois
    [J]. PAIN MEDICINE, 2015, 16 (09) : 1697 - 1708
  • [7] FRYMOYER JW, 1991, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V22, P263
  • [8] BACK PAIN AND SCIATICA
    FRYMOYER, JW
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 318 (05) : 291 - 300
  • [9] CLINICAL-TESTS APPLICABLE TO THE STUDY OF CHRONIC LOW-BACK DISABILITY
    FRYMOYER, JW
    NELSON, RM
    SPANGFORT, E
    WADDELL, G
    [J]. SPINE, 1991, 16 (06) : 681 - 682
  • [10] Hashemi S.M., 2015, ANESTHESIOLOGY PAIN, V5