Editor's Choice - Impact of Endovascular Pedal Artery Revascularisation on Wound Healing in Patients With Critical Limb Ischaemia

被引:31
作者
Jung, Hae Won [1 ]
Ko, Young-Guk [2 ,3 ]
Hong, Sung-Jin [2 ,3 ]
Ahn, Chul-Min [2 ,3 ]
Kim, Jung-Sun [2 ,3 ]
Kim, Byeong-Keuk [2 ,3 ]
Choi, Donghoon [2 ,3 ]
Hong, Myeong-Ki [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Jang, Yangsoo [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Daegu Catholic Univ, Dept Cardiol, Med Ctr, Daegu, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Severance Cardiovasc Hosp, Div Cardiol, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Cardiovasc Inst, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Severance Biomed Sci Inst, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Critical limb ischaemia; Endovascular treatment; Peripheral artery disease; ANGIOSOME REVASCULARIZATION; INFRAPOPLITEAL ANGIOPLASTY; BYPASS-SURGERY; TISSUE LOSS; FOOT; OUTCOMES; ARCH; DEFINITIONS; PREDICTORS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.07.034
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The present study investigated the impact of endovascular pedal artery revascularisation (PAR) on the clinical outcomes of patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI). Methods: This retrospective analysis of a single centre cohort included 239 patients who underwent endovascular revascularisation of infrapopliteal arteries for a chronic ischaemic wound. PAR was attempted in 141 patients during the procedure. After propensity score matching, there were 87 pairs of patients with and without PAR. Results: After the matching, the two groups showed balanced baseline clinical and lesion characteristics. PAR was achieved in 60.9% of the PAR group. Direct angiosome flow was more frequently obtained in the PAR group than in the non-PAR group (81.6% vs. 34.5%; p <.001). Subintimal angioplasty (47.1% vs. 29.9%; p = .019) and pedaleplantar loop technique (18.4% vs. 0%; p <.001) were more frequent in the PAR group. At the one year follow up, the PAR group showed greater freedom from major amputation (96.3% vs. 84.2%; p = .009). The wound healing rate, overall survival, major adverse limb event, and freedom from re-intervention did not differ significantly between the two groups. However, the patient subgroup with successful PAR showed a higher wound healing rate than the non-PAR group (76.0% vs. 67.0%; p = .031). In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model, successful PAR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.564, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.068-2.290; p = .022) was identified as an independent factor associated with improved wound healing, whereas gangrene (HR 0.659, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.471-0.923; p = .015), C reactive protein >3 mg/dL (HR 0.591, 95% CI 0.386-0.904; p = .015), and pre-procedural absence of pedal arch (HR 0.628, 95% CI 0.431-0.916; p = .016) were associated with impaired wound healing. Conclusion: Successful PAR significantly improved wound healing in patients with CLI. Thus, efforts should be made to revascularise the pedal arteries, especially when the pedal arch is completely absent.
引用
收藏
页码:854 / 863
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Results of Infrapopliteal Endovascular Procedures Performed in Diabetic Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia and Tissue Loss from the Perspective of an Angiosome-Oriented Revascularization Strategy
    Acin, Francisco
    Varela, Cesar
    Lopez de Maturana, Ignacio
    de Haro, Joaquin
    Bleda, Silvia
    Rodriguez-Padilla, Javier
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VASCULAR MEDICINE, 2014, 2014
  • [2] Selective Primary Angioplasty Following an Angiosome Model of Reperfusion in the Treatment of Wagner 1-4 Diabetic Foot Lesions: Practice in a Multidisciplinary Diabetic Limb Service
    Alexandrescu, Vlad-Adrian
    Hubermont, Gerard
    Philips, Yvan
    Guillaumie, Benoit
    Ngongang, Christian
    Vandenbossche, Pierre
    Azdad, Khalid
    Ledent, Gilles
    Horion, Jacques
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2008, 15 (05) : 580 - 593
  • [3] Infrapopliteal angioplasty using a combined angiosomal reperfusion strategy
    Ambler, G. K.
    Stimpson, A. L.
    Wardle, B. G.
    Bosanquet, D. C.
    Hanif, U. K.
    Germain, S.
    Chick, C.
    Goyal, N.
    Twine, C. P.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02):
  • [4] Angiosomes of the foot and ankle and clinical implications for limb salvage: Reconstruction, incisions, and revascularization
    Attinger, CE
    Evans, KK
    Bulan, E
    Blume, P
    Cooper, P
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 117 (07) : 261S - 293S
  • [5] Factors Influencing Wound Healing of Critical Ischaemic Foot after Bypass Surgery: Is the Angiosome Important in Selecting Bypass Target Artery?
    Azuma, N.
    Uchida, H.
    Kokubo, T.
    Koya, A.
    Akasaka, N.
    Sasajima, T.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 43 (03) : 322 - 328
  • [6] Infrapopliteal Angioplasty of One or More than One Artery for Critical Limb Ischaemia: A Randomised Clinical Trial
    Biagioni, Rodrigo B.
    Biagioni, Luisa C.
    Nasser, Felipe
    Burihan, Marcelo C.
    Ingrund, Jose C.
    Neser, Adnan
    Miranda, Fausto, Jr.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 55 (04) : 518 - 527
  • [7] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Direct Versus Indirect Angiosomal Revascularisation of Infrapopliteal Arteries
    Bosanquet, D. C.
    Glasbey, J. C. D.
    Williams, I. M.
    Twine, C. P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 48 (01) : 88 - 97
  • [8] Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial
    Bradbury, AW
    Ruckley, CV
    Fowkes, FGR
    Forbes, JF
    Gillespie, I
    Adam, DJ
    Beard, JD
    Cleveland, T
    Bell, J
    Raab, G
    Storkey, H
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 366 (9501) : 1925 - 1934
  • [9] Bunte Matthew C, 2017, Interv Cardiol Clin, V6, P271, DOI 10.1016/j.iccl.2016.12.010
  • [10] Trans-Collateral angioplasty for a challenging chronic total occlusion of the tibial vessels: A novel approach to percutaneous revascularization in critical lower limb ischemia
    Fusaro, Massimiliano
    Agostoni, Pierfrancesco
    Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2008, 71 (02) : 268 - 272