Effect of detector element size on signal detectability in digital mammography

被引:6
|
作者
Burgess, AE [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
breast structure; detector element size; digital mammography; lesion detectability; microcalcifications; SNR;
D O I
10.1117/12.593770
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The purpose of this work was to evaluate the effect of detector element size on detection and discrimination of small objects in digital mammograms in the presence of quantum noise, stochastic breast structure {P (f) = K/f(3))} and system (electronic) noise. Theoretical analysis was done using the Fourier domain approximation of Albert and Maidment (Medical Physics, Vol. 27, pp 2417-2434, 2000), including averaging over random but known signal locations and aliasing. Realistic CsI-based indirect detection system operating parameters were used with 4 detector element sizes (25, 50, 75 and 100 microns). Detailed results depended on selected input exposure and system noise level (10 mR and 100 photons/del equivalent photon input were used). Results will be described using size thresholds based on human decision performance estimates - typical threshold SNRs were about 6 to 7 at 95% decision accuracy. The selected tasks and approximate threshold sizes were: searching for a microcalcification in a 1 cm(2) cluster (140 microns), two-alternative forced-choice microcalcification discrimination of shape (220 microns) and edge gradient (290 microns), and searching for a spiculation (cylinder model) around the perimeter of a known mass. MC task threshold variations with del size were small (usually less than 5% variation). Spiculation thresholds depended on length and surrounding tissue composition - del size and system noise had little effect. For 15 mm spiculations, the threshold diameters were about 0.5 nim in fatty tissue and 1.3 mm in 50% glandular tissue.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 242
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE EFFECT OF DISPLAY ELEMENT SIZE ON LESION DETECTABILITY
    SHARP, PF
    MALLARD, JR
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1980, 25 (04): : 783 - 783
  • [2] Effect of detector type on cancer detection in digital mammography
    Mackenzie, A.
    Warren, L. M.
    Dance, D. R.
    Cooke, J.
    Halling-Brown, M.
    Looney, P.
    Chakraborty, D. P.
    Wallis, M. G.
    Given-Wilson, R. M.
    Young, K. C.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 15
  • [3] Detectability of Fibrils by Dilation Technique in Digital Mammography
    Omar, Siti Shuwaibah Che
    Hassan, Wan Muhamad Saridan Wan
    Nor, Norehan Mohd
    Suri, Mohd Syafiq Mohd
    Shariff, Nurul Diyana
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 17 (04): : 446 - 456
  • [4] Relationship between Detector Size and the Need for Extra Images and their Effect on Radiation Exposure in Digital Mammography Screening
    Entz, K.
    Sommer, A.
    Heindel, W.
    Lenzen, H.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2014, 186 (09): : 868 - 875
  • [5] A quantitative method for evaluating the detectability of lesions in digital mammography
    Zanca, F.
    Van Ongeval, C.
    Jacobs, J.
    Marchal, G.
    Bosmans, H.
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2008, 129 (1-3) : 214 - 218
  • [6] THE OPTIMIZATION OF SIGNAL DETECTABILITY IN DIGITAL FLUOROSCOPY
    ZAMENHOF, RG
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1982, 9 (05) : 688 - 694
  • [7] Task-based detectability in anatomical background in digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and synthetic mammography
    Monnin, P.
    Damet, J.
    Bosmans, H.
    Marshall, N. W.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2024, 69 (02):
  • [8] Direct conversion detector for digital mammography
    Polischuk, B
    Rougeot, H
    Wong, K
    Debrie, A
    Poliquin, E
    Hansroul, M
    Martin, JP
    Truong, TT
    Choquette, M
    Laperrière, L
    Shukri, Z
    MEDICAL IMAGING 1999: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 1999, 3659 : 417 - 425
  • [9] Modelling the imaging performance and low contrast detectability in digital mammography
    Spyropoulou, V.
    Kalyvas, N.
    Gaitanis, A.
    Michail, C.
    Panayiotakis, G.
    Kandarakis, I.
    JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION, 2009, 4
  • [10] A Statistical Method for Low Contrast Detectability Assessment in Digital Mammography
    Spadavecchia, Chiara
    Villa, Raffaele
    Pasquali, Claudia
    Paruccini, Nicoletta
    Oberhofer, Nadia
    Crespi, Andrea
    BREAST IMAGING, IWDM 2016, 2016, 9699 : 532 - 539