Effect of detector element size on signal detectability in digital mammography

被引:6
作者
Burgess, AE [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2005: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2 | 2005年 / 5745卷
关键词
breast structure; detector element size; digital mammography; lesion detectability; microcalcifications; SNR;
D O I
10.1117/12.593770
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The purpose of this work was to evaluate the effect of detector element size on detection and discrimination of small objects in digital mammograms in the presence of quantum noise, stochastic breast structure {P (f) = K/f(3))} and system (electronic) noise. Theoretical analysis was done using the Fourier domain approximation of Albert and Maidment (Medical Physics, Vol. 27, pp 2417-2434, 2000), including averaging over random but known signal locations and aliasing. Realistic CsI-based indirect detection system operating parameters were used with 4 detector element sizes (25, 50, 75 and 100 microns). Detailed results depended on selected input exposure and system noise level (10 mR and 100 photons/del equivalent photon input were used). Results will be described using size thresholds based on human decision performance estimates - typical threshold SNRs were about 6 to 7 at 95% decision accuracy. The selected tasks and approximate threshold sizes were: searching for a microcalcification in a 1 cm(2) cluster (140 microns), two-alternative forced-choice microcalcification discrimination of shape (220 microns) and edge gradient (290 microns), and searching for a spiculation (cylinder model) around the perimeter of a known mass. MC task threshold variations with del size were small (usually less than 5% variation). Spiculation thresholds depended on length and surrounding tissue composition - del size and system noise had little effect. For 15 mm spiculations, the threshold diameters were about 0.5 nim in fatty tissue and 1.3 mm in 50% glandular tissue.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 242
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] ABBEY CK, 2000, HDB MED IMAGING PHYS, pCH11
  • [2] Performance of advanced a-Si/CsI-based flat panel x-ray detectors for mammography
    Albagli, D
    Hudspeth, H
    Possin, G
    Lee, J
    Granfors, P
    Giambattista, B
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2003: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2003, 5030 : 553 - 563
  • [3] Linear response theory for detectors consisting of discrete arrays
    Albert, M
    Maidment, ADA
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (10) : 2417 - 2434
  • [4] BARRETT HH, 2004, FDN IMAGING SCI
  • [5] VISUAL SIGNAL-DETECTION .2. SIGNAL-LOCATION IDENTIFICATION
    BURGESS, AE
    GHANDEHARIAN, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1984, 1 (08): : 906 - 910
  • [6] Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise
    Burgess, AE
    Jacobson, FL
    Judy, PF
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 28 (04) : 419 - 437
  • [7] BURGESS AE, 1984, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INST, V454, P18, DOI 10.1117/12.939309
  • [8] Analytical approximations to the Hotelling trace for digital x-ray detectors
    Clarkson, E
    Pineda, AR
    Barrett, HH
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2001: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2001, 4320 : 339 - 349
  • [9] A lesion detectability simulation method for digital x-ray imaging
    Cooper, VN
    Boone, JM
    Seibert, JA
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (01) : 66 - 74
  • [10] Visibility of microcalcifications in computed and screen-film mammography
    Cowen, AR
    Launders, JH
    Jadav, M
    Brettle, DS
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1997, 42 (08) : 1533 - 1548