Motor performance, postural stability and behaviour of non-disabled extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight children at four to five years of age

被引:28
作者
Brown, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Burns, Yvonne R. [1 ,2 ]
Watter, Pauline [2 ]
Gibbons, Kristen S. [3 ]
Gray, Peter H. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mater Mothers Hosp, Growth & Dev Unit, South Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Mater Res Inst, South Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia
关键词
Children; Preterm; Neurodevelopment; Motor; DEVELOPMENTAL COORDINATION DISORDER; MOVEMENT ASSESSMENT BATTERY; INFANTS; BORN; ELBW; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.03.003
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight (ELBW) children who are non-disabled and otherwise healthy are at risk of neurodevelopmental impairments. Further understanding of these impairments is needed before commencement of formal education to optimise participation levels at a critical time point for these children. Aims: To explore motor co-ordination, postural stability, limb strength and behaviour of non-disabled four to five year old children with a history of extreme prematurity or ELBW. Study design: Prospective-descriptive-cohort-study. Subjects: 50 children born at less than 28 weeks gestation or who had a birth weight less than 1000 g with minimal/mild motor impairments and no significant neurological/cognitive impairments. Outcome measures: Movement Assessment Battery for Children second-edition (MABC-2), single leg stance test (SLS), lateral reach test, standing long jump test and Child Behaviour Checklist for preschool children (CBCL). Results: The mean percentile rank of the extremely preterm or ELBW sample on MABC-2 was 31% (SD 23%). SLS right (mean +/- SD; 4.6 +/- 2.5 s) and lateral reach to the right (10.0 +/- 3.9 cm) were slightly stronger than SLS left (4.4 +/- 33 s) and lateral reach left (9.9 +/- 35 cm). The average for standing long jump was 71.6 cm (SD 21.0 cm). All participants were classified as 'normal' on CBCL syndrome scale scores, internalizing and externalizing syndrome T scores and total problem T score. Conclusions: This sample of non-disabled extremely preterm or ELBW children performed in the lower range of normal. These children continue to be at risk of impairments, therefore, ongoing monitoring and tailored intervention may optimise development. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 315
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Achenbach T., 2000, Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms profiles
[2]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596
[3]  
[Anonymous], BMJ
[4]  
Auld M, 2008, DEV MED CHILD NEUROL, V50, P49
[5]  
Bartlett Doreen, 2003, Pediatr Phys Ther, V15, P84, DOI 10.1097/01.PEP.0000067885.63909.5C
[6]   Neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants [J].
Bos, Arend F. ;
Roze, Elise .
DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2011, 53 :35-39
[7]  
Brauer S, 1999, Physiother Res Int, V4, P81, DOI 10.1002/pri.155
[8]   The Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (MABC-2): A Review and Critique [J].
Brown, Ted ;
Lalor, Aislinn .
PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN PEDIATRICS, 2009, 29 (01) :86-103
[9]   Movement and motor development in ELBW infants at 1 year is related to cognitive and motor abilities at 4 years [J].
Burns, Y ;
O'Callaghan, M ;
McDonell, B ;
Rogers, Y .
EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 80 (01) :19-29
[10]  
Burns Y, 2010, DEV MED CHILD NEUROL, V52, P59