Comparative value of a simulation by gaming and a traditional teaching method to improve clinical reasoning skills necessary to detect patient deterioration: a randomized study in nursing students

被引:58
作者
Blanie, Antonia [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Amorim, Michel-Ange [3 ,4 ]
Benhamou, Dan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Fac Med Paris Saclay, Ctr Simulat LabForSIMS, F-94275 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[2] CHU Bicetre, Dept Anesthesie Reanimat, 78 Rue Gen Leclerc, F-94275 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[3] Univ Paris Saclay, Univ Paris Sud, CIAMS, F-91405 Orsay, France
[4] Univ Orleans, CIAMS, F-45067 Orleans, France
关键词
Serious games; Simulation; Clinical reasoning; Motivation; Nursing students; Deterioration; Script concordance test; TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED SIMULATION; HEALTH-PROFESSIONS EDUCATION; SCRIPT CONCORDANCE TEST; SERIOUS GAME; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; DECISION-MAKING; CARE; COMMUNICATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-020-1939-6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Early detection and response to patient deterioration influence patient prognosis. Nursing education is therefore essential. The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the respective educational value of simulation by gaming (SG) and a traditional teaching (TT) method to improve clinical reasoning (CR) skills necessary to detect patient deterioration. Methods In a prospective multicenter study, and after consent, 2nd year nursing students were randomized into two groups: Simulation by gaming "SG": the student played individually with a serious game consisting of 2 cases followed by a common debriefing with an instructor; Traditional Teaching "TT": the student worked on the same cases in text paper format followed by a traditional teaching course with a PowerPoint presentation by an instructor. CR skill was measured by script concordance tests (80 SCTs, score 0-100) immediately after the session (primary outcome) and on month later. Other outcomes included students' satisfaction, motivation and professional impact. Results One hundred forty-six students were randomized. Immediately after training, the SCTs scores were 59 +/- 9 in SG group (n = 73) and 58 +/- 8 in TT group (n = 73) (p = 0.43). One month later, the SCTs scores were 59 +/- 10 in SG group (n = 65) and 58 +/- 8 in TT group (n = 54) (p = 0.77). Global satisfaction and motivation were highly valued in both groups although significantly greater in the SG group (p < 0.05). The students declared that the training course would have a positive professional impact, with no difference between groups. Conclusions In this study assessing nursing student CR to detect patient deterioration, no significant educational difference (SCT), neither immediate nor 1 month later, was observed between training by SG and the TT course. However, satisfaction and motivation were found to be greater with the use of SG.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[31]   A Serious Game for Teaching Nursing Students Clinical Reasoning and Decision-Making Skills [J].
Johnsen, Hege Mari ;
Fossum, Mariann ;
Vivekananda-Schmidt, Pirashanthie ;
Fruhling, Ann ;
Slettebo, Ashild .
NURSING INFORMATICS 2016: EHEALTH FOR ALL: EVERY LEVEL COLLABORATION - FROM PROJECT TO REALIZATION, 2016, 225 :905-906
[32]   Learning decision making through serious games [J].
Kaczmarczyk, Joseph ;
Davidson, Richard ;
Bryden, Daniele ;
Haselden, Stephen ;
Vivekananda-Schmidt, Pirashanthie .
CLINICAL TEACHER, 2016, 13 (04) :277-282
[33]   Learning by playing: A cross-sectional descriptive study of nursing students' experiences of learning clinical reasoning [J].
Koivisto, Jaana-Maija ;
Multisilta, Jari ;
Niemi, Hannele ;
Katajisto, Jouko ;
Eriksson, Elina .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2016, 45 :22-28
[34]   Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education [J].
Kolb, AY ;
Kolb, DA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, 2005, 4 (02) :193-212
[35]   The 'five rights' of clinical reasoning: An educational model to enhance nursing students' ability to identify and manage clinically 'at risk' patients [J].
Levett-Jones, Tracy ;
Hoffman, Kerry ;
Dempsey, Jennifer ;
Jeong, Sarah Yeun-Sim ;
Noble, Danielle ;
Norton, Carol Anne ;
Roche, Janiece ;
Hickey, Noelene .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2010, 30 (06) :515-520
[36]   Development and psychometric testing of a Clinical Reasoning Evaluation Simulation Tool (CREST) for assessing nursing students' abilities to recognize and respond to clinical deterioration [J].
Liaw, Sok Ying ;
Rashasegaran, Ahtherai ;
Wong, Lai Fun ;
Deneen, Christopher Charles ;
Cooper, Simon ;
Levett-Jones, Tracy ;
Goh, Hongli Sam ;
Ignacio, Jeanette .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2018, 62 :74-79
[37]   The impact of a Web-based educational program on the recognition and management of deteriorating patients [J].
Liaw, Sok Ying ;
Chng, Devon Yun Jia ;
Wong, Lai Fun ;
Ho, Jasmine Tze Yin ;
Mordiffi, Siti Zubaidah ;
Cooper, Simon ;
Chua, Wei Ling ;
Ang, Emily Neo Kim .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2017, 26 (23-24) :4848-4856
[38]   Effectiveness of a Web-Based Simulation in Improving Nurses' Workplace Practice With Deteriorating Ward Patients: A Pre- and Postintervention Study [J].
Liaw, Sok Ying ;
Wong, Lai Fun ;
Lim, Eunice Ya Ping ;
Ang, Sophia Bee Leng ;
Mujumdar, Sandhya ;
Ho, Jasmine Tze Yin ;
Mordiffi, Siti Zubaidah ;
Ang, Emily Neo Kim .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (02)
[39]   Comparison of Virtual Patient Simulation With Mannequin-Based Simulation for Improving Clinical Performances in Assessing and Managing Clinical Deterioration: Randomized Controlled Trial [J].
Liaw, Sok Ying ;
Chan, Sally Wai-Chi ;
Chen, Fun-Gee ;
Hooi, Shing Chuan ;
Siau, Chiang .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (09)
[40]   The development and psychometric testing of a theory-based instrument to evaluate nurses' perception of clinical reasoning competence [J].
Liou, Shwu-Ru ;
Liu, Hsiu-Chen ;
Tsai, Hsiu-Min ;
Tsai, Ying-Huang ;
Lin, Yu-Ching ;
Chang, Chia-Hao ;
Cheng, Ching-Yu .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2016, 72 (03) :707-717