Comparative value of a simulation by gaming and a traditional teaching method to improve clinical reasoning skills necessary to detect patient deterioration: a randomized study in nursing students

被引:58
作者
Blanie, Antonia [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Amorim, Michel-Ange [3 ,4 ]
Benhamou, Dan [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Fac Med Paris Saclay, Ctr Simulat LabForSIMS, F-94275 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[2] CHU Bicetre, Dept Anesthesie Reanimat, 78 Rue Gen Leclerc, F-94275 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[3] Univ Paris Saclay, Univ Paris Sud, CIAMS, F-91405 Orsay, France
[4] Univ Orleans, CIAMS, F-45067 Orleans, France
关键词
Serious games; Simulation; Clinical reasoning; Motivation; Nursing students; Deterioration; Script concordance test; TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED SIMULATION; HEALTH-PROFESSIONS EDUCATION; SCRIPT CONCORDANCE TEST; SERIOUS GAME; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; DECISION-MAKING; CARE; COMMUNICATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-020-1939-6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Early detection and response to patient deterioration influence patient prognosis. Nursing education is therefore essential. The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the respective educational value of simulation by gaming (SG) and a traditional teaching (TT) method to improve clinical reasoning (CR) skills necessary to detect patient deterioration. Methods In a prospective multicenter study, and after consent, 2nd year nursing students were randomized into two groups: Simulation by gaming "SG": the student played individually with a serious game consisting of 2 cases followed by a common debriefing with an instructor; Traditional Teaching "TT": the student worked on the same cases in text paper format followed by a traditional teaching course with a PowerPoint presentation by an instructor. CR skill was measured by script concordance tests (80 SCTs, score 0-100) immediately after the session (primary outcome) and on month later. Other outcomes included students' satisfaction, motivation and professional impact. Results One hundred forty-six students were randomized. Immediately after training, the SCTs scores were 59 +/- 9 in SG group (n = 73) and 58 +/- 8 in TT group (n = 73) (p = 0.43). One month later, the SCTs scores were 59 +/- 10 in SG group (n = 65) and 58 +/- 8 in TT group (n = 54) (p = 0.77). Global satisfaction and motivation were highly valued in both groups although significantly greater in the SG group (p < 0.05). The students declared that the training course would have a positive professional impact, with no difference between groups. Conclusions In this study assessing nursing student CR to detect patient deterioration, no significant educational difference (SCT), neither immediate nor 1 month later, was observed between training by SG and the TT course. However, satisfaction and motivation were found to be greater with the use of SG.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   An open randomized controlled study comparing an online text-based scenario and a serious game by Belgian and Swiss pharmacy students [J].
Berger, Jerome ;
Bawab, Noura ;
De Mooij, Jeremy ;
Widmer, Denise Sutter ;
Szilas, Nicolas ;
De Vriese, Carine ;
Bugnon, Olivier .
CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2018, 10 (03) :267-276
[2]  
Bergeron Bryan., 2006, Developing serious games
[3]   Game-Based E-Learning Is More Effective than a Conventional Instructional Method: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Third-Year Medical Students [J].
Boeker, Martin ;
Andel, Peter ;
Vach, Werner ;
Frankenschmidt, Alexander .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12)
[4]  
Bogossian Fiona E, 2015, Nurse Educ Today, V35, pe36, DOI 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.08.003
[5]   Association between clinically abnormal observations and subsequent in-hospital mortality: a prospective study [J].
Buist, M ;
Bernard, S ;
Nguyen, TV ;
Moore, G ;
Anderson, J .
RESUSCITATION, 2004, 62 (02) :137-141
[6]   What's in a Name? Clarifying the Nomenclature of Virtual Simulation [J].
Cant, Robyn ;
Cooper, Simon ;
Sussex, Roland ;
Bogossian, Fiona .
CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2019, 27 :26-30
[7]   Assessment in the Context of Uncertainty Using the Script Concordance Test: More Meaning for Scores [J].
Charlin, Bernard ;
Gagnon, Robert ;
Lubarsky, Stuart ;
Lambert, Carole ;
Meterissian, Sarkis ;
Chalk, Colin ;
Goudreau, Johanne ;
van der Vleuten, Cees .
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 2010, 22 (03) :180-186
[8]  
Cheng A, 2016, CLIN SIMUL NURS, V12, pA3, DOI [10.1016/j.ecns.2016.04.008, 10.1186/s41077-016-0025-y]
[9]   Technology-Enhanced Simulation to Assess Health Professionals: A Systematic Review of Validity Evidence, Research Methods, and Reporting Quality [J].
Cook, David A. ;
Brydges, Ryan ;
Zendejas, Benjamin ;
Hamstra, Stanley J. ;
Hatala, Rose .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2013, 88 (06) :872-883
[10]   Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: Systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Cook, David A. ;
Hamstra, Stanley J. ;
Brydges, Ryan ;
Zendejas, Benjamin ;
Szostek, Jason H. ;
Wang, Amy T. ;
Erwin, Patricia J. ;
Hatala, Rose .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2013, 35 (01) :E844-E875