Do country or firm-specific factors matter more to R&D spending in firms?
被引:8
作者:
Banerjee, Rajabrata
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ South Australia, UniSA Business, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, AustraliaUniv South Australia, UniSA Business, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
Banerjee, Rajabrata
[1
]
Gupta, Kartick
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ South Australia, UniSA Business, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, AustraliaUniv South Australia, UniSA Business, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
Gupta, Kartick
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ South Australia, UniSA Business, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
R&D;
Cross-country;
Globalisation;
MARKET VALUE;
FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT;
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE;
DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY;
PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH;
TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER;
EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE;
CAPITAL STRUCTURE;
EXPORT BEHAVIOR;
ECONOMIC-GROWTH;
D O I:
10.1016/j.iref.2021.05.008
中图分类号:
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号:
0202 ;
摘要:
To what extent can firm, industry- and country-level factors explain firm-level R&D spending? Using a comprehensive dataset, which consists of 94,178 firm-year observations covering 42 countries and spanning 1981-2013, we examine this question by capturing multiple dimensions of the market and institutional characteristics. Our findings suggest that firm, industry- and country-level determinants jointly have the maximum explanatory power. More importantly, firm- and industry-level determinants have higher explanatory power than country-level determinants. We also show that the effect is similar for countries with weaker and stronger institutional scores related to R&D and for industries that are R&D intensive. These results are robust to adopting alternative empirical specifications of R&D intensity and correcting for missing R&D values. Our study has strong policy implications that show when international firms are investing in R&D related to FDI, they need to focus more on their own organisation and capital structures in the host country based on how the project is managed internally.