Paradoxical Virtual Leadership: Reconsidering Virtuality Through a Paradox Lens

被引:27
作者
Purvanova, Radostina K. [1 ]
Kenda, Renata [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Drake Univ, Dept Management & Int Business, Des Moines, IA 50311 USA
[2] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg Sch Social & Behav Sci, Dept Org Studies, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
virtual leadership; virtuality; paradox; paradoxical tensions; synergistic leadership; FACE-TO-FACE; MANAGING STRATEGIC CONTRADICTIONS; CULTURAL-DIVERSITY; COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY; GEOGRAPHIC DISPERSION; TEAMS; WORK; MODEL; TIME; COLLABORATION;
D O I
10.1177/1059601118794102
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This conceptual article moves the conversation about virtual leadership forward by blending extant knowledge on virtuality and on leadership. Drawing on paradox theory, we show that virtuality is a paradox; therefore, virtual leadership's core function is to deal with paradox. Our paradoxical virtual leadership model introduces three distinct leadership styles: synergistic, selective, and stagnant. Synergistic leaders view virtuality through a both-and cognitive framework, integrate divergent forces into synergistic solutions, and engage in varied, even opposing, behaviors to synergize virtuality's paradoxical tensions and leverage the power of paradox. In contrast, selective leaders view virtuality through an either-or framework, and attempt to either manage virtuality's challenges, or to capitalize on its opportunities, thus failing to balance paradoxical tensions. Finally, stagnant leaders adopt an avoidant framework, ignoring or avoiding virtuality's paradoxes, and fail to lead effective virtual teams. The practical implications of this modelespecially as they relate to how virtual leaders can synergize paradoxical tensionsare discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:752 / 786
页数:35
相关论文
共 89 条
[11]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[12]   E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice [J].
Avolio, BJ ;
Kahai, S ;
Dodge, GE .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2000, 11 (04) :615-668
[13]   Comparing distributed and face-to-face meetings for software architecture evaluation: A controlled experiment [J].
Babar, Muhammad Ali ;
Kitchenham, Barbara ;
Jeffery, Ross .
EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2008, 13 (01) :39-62
[14]   E-mail as a Source and Symbol of Stress [J].
Barley, Stephen R. ;
Meyerson, Debra E. ;
Grodal, Stine .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (04) :887-906
[15]   Knowing Where You Stand: Physical Isolation, Perceived Respect, and Organizational Identification Among Virtual Employees [J].
Bartel, Caroline A. ;
Wrzesniewski, Amy ;
Wiesenfeld, Batia M. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2012, 23 (03) :743-757
[16]   A typology of virtual teams - Implications for effective leadership [J].
Bell, BS ;
Kozlowski, SWJ .
GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT, 2002, 27 (01) :14-49
[17]  
Blenke Lawrence R., 2017, International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, V9, P95
[18]   Expertise and collaboration in the geographically dispersed organization [J].
Boh, Wai Fong ;
Ren, Yuqing ;
Kiesler, Sara ;
Bussjaeger, Robert .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (04) :595-612
[19]  
Chen M.J., 2002, ASIA J MANAGEMENT, V19, P179, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1016235517735
[20]   Anger and happiness in virtual teams: Emotional influences of text and behavior on others' affect in the absence of non-verbal cues [J].
Cheshin, Arik ;
Rafaeli, Anat ;
Bos, Nathan .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2011, 116 (01) :2-16