Explaining very early acute mild traumatic brain injury after motor vehicle collision pain variability: additive value of pain sensitivity questionnaire

被引:7
|
作者
Kuperman, Pora [1 ]
Granovsky, Yelena [1 ]
Bahouth, Hany [2 ]
Fadel, Shiri [1 ]
Ben Lulu, Hen [2 ]
Bosak, Noam [3 ]
Buxbaum, Chen [3 ]
Sprecher, Elliot [3 ]
Crystal, Shoshana [1 ]
Granot, Michal [4 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Med, Haifa, Israel
[2] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Trauma & Emergency Surg, Haifa, Israel
[3] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Dept Neurol, Haifa, Israel
[4] Univ Haifa, Fac Welf & Hlth Sci, IL-31905 Haifa, Israel
关键词
Mild traumatic brain injury; Pain; Quantitative sensory testing; Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire; Motor vehicle collision; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; MODULATION; PREDICTION; VALIDATION; EXPERIENCE; INTENSITY; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1097/PR9.0000000000000821
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction and Objectives:Chronic pain is a common postcollision consequence. Wherein, a clearer understanding of acute pain can help stem the acute-to-chronic pain transition. However, the variability of acute pain is only partially explained by psychophysical pain characteristics as measured by quantitative sensory testing. The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) may reflect inherent psychocognitive representations of patient's sensitivity and thus may reveal less-explored pain dimensions. In the vein of the biopsychosocial approach, this study aimed to explore whether PSQ holds additive value in explaining head and neck pain reports in very early acute-stage mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) after collision, above the use of psychophysical assessment.Methods:Study cohort (n = 130) consisted of mTBI patients (age range 19-66, 57 F) after accident with area-of-injury pain of at least 20 on the day of testing (mean pain 58.4 21.6, range 20-100 Numerical Pain Scale) who underwent clinical, psychophysical, and pain-related psychological assessment within 72-hour after injury.Results:Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire scores were significantly correlated with acute clinical, psychophysical, and pain-related psychological measures. Regression model (R-2 = 0.241, P < 0.001) showed that, together, age, sex, high PSQ, enhanced temporal summation, and less-efficient conditioned pain modulation explained head and neck pain variance. This model demonstrated that the strongest contribution to degree of postinjury pain was independently explained by PSQ (<ss> = 0.32) and then pressure pain threshold-conditioned pain modulation (ss = -0.25).Conclusion:Appraisal of cognitive daily-pain representations, by way of memory and imagination, provides an additional important dispositional facet to explain the variability in the acute mTBI postcollision clinical pain experience, above assessing nociceptive responsiveness to experimentally induced pain.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [31] Acute neck pain at the emergency department as predictor of outcome after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI): a distinct category within the mTBI spectrum
    Coffeng, S.
    Jacobs, B.
    De Koning, M.
    Hageman, G.
    Roks, G.
    Van der Naalt, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 935 - 935
  • [32] A Review of Chronic Pain and Cognitive, Mood, and Motor Dysfunction Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Complex, Comorbid, and/or Overlapping Conditions?
    Grandhi, Ramesh
    Tavakoli, Samon
    Ortega, Catherine
    Simmonds, Maureen J.
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2017, 7 (12):
  • [33] The association between pain-related variables, emotional factors, and attentional functioning after mild traumatic brain injury
    McKerral, Michelle
    Beaupre, Michelle
    BRAIN INJURY, 2012, 26 (4-5) : 391 - 392
  • [34] A Population-Based, Inception Cohort Study of the Incidence and Prognosis of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury After Motor Vehicle Collisions
    Cassidy, J. David
    Boyle, Eleanor
    Carroll, Linda
    BRAIN INJURY, 2012, 26 (4-5) : 650 - 650
  • [35] Few individuals at high risk of persistent musculoskeletal pain after motor vehicle collision receive early psychological or physiotherapy intervention
    Villard, M.
    Beaudoin, F.
    Hu, J.
    Orrey, D.
    Peak, D.
    Jones, J.
    Swor, R.
    Domeier, R.
    Lee, D.
    Rathlev, N.
    Hendry, P.
    McLean, S.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2015, 16 (04): : S33 - S33
  • [36] Presence of pain in acute mild traumatic brain injury patients blunts electroencephalographic differences: a controlled sleep lab-study
    Khoury, S.
    Chouchou, F.
    Amzica, F.
    Pelletier, S.
    Denis, R.
    Giguere, J. -F.
    Lavigne, G.
    JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH, 2012, 21 : 177 - 177
  • [37] Risk of Motor Vehicle Collision or Driving Impairment After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Collaborative International Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chee, Justin N.
    Hawley, Carol
    Charlton, Judith L.
    Marshall, Shawn
    Gillespie, Ian
    Koppel, Sjaan
    Vrkljan, Brenda
    Ayotte, Debbie
    Rapoport, Mark J.
    JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2019, 34 (01) : E27 - E38
  • [38] Motor recovery in patients after traumatic brain injury using kinesitherapy during acute period and early rehabilitation
    Franckeviciute, E. V.
    Krisciunas, A. J.
    ZHURNAL NEVROLOGII I PSIKHIATRII IMENI S S KORSAKOVA, 2007, 107 (09) : 45 - 49
  • [39] Physical activity behavior in the first month after mild traumatic brain injury is associated with physiological and psychological risk factors for chronic pain
    Naugle, Kelly M.
    Corrona, Sam
    Smith, Jared A.
    Nguyen, Tyler
    Saxe, Jonathan
    White, Fletcher A.
    PAIN REPORTS, 2021, 6 (04) : E969
  • [40] The Association Between Pain Type, Cognition and Complaint After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Prospectively Studied Premorbidly Healthy Adults Admitted to Hospital
    Anderson, Jacqueline F., I
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 34 (01) : 53 - 62