Environmental impacts related to the commissioning and usage phase of an intelligent energy management system

被引:16
作者
Gangolells, Marta [1 ]
Casals, Miquel [1 ]
Forcada, Nuria [1 ]
Macarulla, Marcel [1 ]
Giretti, Alberto [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Dept Construct Engn, Grp Construct Res & Innovat GRIC, Terrassa 08222, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Marche, Dept Civil Engn & Architecture, I-60100 Ancona, Italy
关键词
Energy management system; Environmental impacts; Life cycle assessment; Underground station; Metro network; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER; TECHNOLOGIES; INFORMATION; CRT; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.10.070
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper presents for the first time the results of a life cycle assessment study for an intelligent energy management system. We considered material acquisition, manufacturing, transportation, assembly, operation and maintenance stages. The results show that the assembly phase had an environmental impact of 897 Eco-indicator 99 points that was mainly due to the monitoring subsystem (87.80%). When the analysis was extended to cover the use phase, the environmental impact ranged from 1963 (useful life of 5 years) to 3029 Eco-indicator 99 points (useful life of 10 years). The environmental impact of the use stage was found to represent 54-70% of the total, whereas the assembly stage represented 46-30%. The maintenance phase contributed to a very small extent to the total environmental impact (less than 0.5%). In any case, the impact on resources was the largest (about 51%), whereas the human health damage category amounted to approximately 35% and the ecosystem quality damage category represented about 14% of the total impact. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 223
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, International standard ISO 14044:2006 - Environmental management _____ Life cycle assessment _____ Requirements and guidelines
[2]  
Ansuini R, 2013, P 13 INT C IBPSA BSS, P1793
[3]   Lessons learned - Review of LCAs for ICT products and services [J].
Arushanyan, Yevgeniya ;
Ekener-Petersen, Elisabeth ;
Finnveden, Goran .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2014, 65 (02) :211-234
[4]  
Bitencourt de Oliveira F., 2012, THESIS KTH STOCKHOLM
[5]   Comparative life cycle assessments: The case of paper and digital media [J].
Bull, Justin G. ;
Kozak, Robert A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2014, 45 :10-18
[6]   Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review [J].
Cabeza, Luisa F. ;
Rincon, Lidia ;
Vilarino, Virginia ;
Perez, Gabriel ;
Castell, Albert .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 29 :394-416
[7]  
Casals M, 2014, ENERGY BUIL IN PRESS
[8]   Life cycle assessment of a personal computer and its effective recycling rate [J].
Choi, BC ;
Shin, HS ;
Lee, SY ;
Hur, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2006, 11 (02) :122-128
[9]   Comparative analysis of concentrating solar power and photovoltaic technologies: Technical and environmental evaluations [J].
Desideri, U. ;
Zepparelli, F. ;
Morettini, V. ;
Garroni, E. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 102 :765-784
[10]   Life Cycle Assessment of a ground-mounted 1778 kWp photovoltaic plant and comparison with traditional energy production systems [J].
Desideri, Umberto ;
Proietti, Stefania ;
Zepparelli, Francesco ;
Sdringola, Paolo ;
Bini, Silvia .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2012, 97 :930-943