The Process of Trust Building Between University Researchers and Urban School Personnel

被引:16
作者
Barnett, Michael [1 ]
Anderson, Janice [2 ]
Houle, Meredith [3 ]
Higginbotham, Thomas [4 ]
Gatling, Ann [5 ]
机构
[1] Boston Coll, Lynch Sch Educ, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Educ, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] San Diego State Univ, Ctr Res Math & Sci Educ, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[4] Happy Valley Middle Sch, Portland, OR USA
[5] Merrimack Coll, N Andover, MA 01845 USA
关键词
trust building; urban teachers; research methodology;
D O I
10.1177/0042085910377297
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
A wide range of research has examined trust building within corporations, businesses, and schools, and between and within organizations, but little research has been conducted that examines trust formation between university researchers and classroom-based teachers. Using a qualitative methodological approach, the authors examined the development of trusting relationships between their educational research team and a series of urban science teachers after 3 years of partnerships. It was found that teachers were initially cautiously optimistic about working with the research team, not wanting to invest much effort in the partnership until the research team had proven they were open, honest, and, most importantly, dedicated to helping their students. It was also found that the process of trust building began with an initial tentative and hesitant frontstage persona and eventually progressed to the point where they felt comfortable dropping their frontstage mask to engage in backstage conversations. The authors discovered that the trust-building process was transformative, in that, as trust was developed, it fostered the blurring of their social identities with the teachers as the teachers became teacher/researchers and the research team likewise became researcher/teachers.
引用
收藏
页码:630 / 660
页数:31
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Abbott Andrew., 1992, WHAT IS CASE, P53
[2]  
Abell SK, 2000, J RES SCI TEACH, V37, P548, DOI 10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<548::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-D
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, GUIDE DEV ED PARTNER
[5]  
Arora A.G., 2000, Journal of Science Teacher Education, V11, P155, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1009472909785
[6]  
Ball D., 2000, Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education, P365
[7]   Critical design ethnography: Designing for change [J].
Barab, SA ;
Thomas, MK ;
Dodge, T ;
Squire, K ;
Newell, M .
ANTHROPOLOGY & EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2004, 35 (02) :254-268
[8]   Achieving successful school-university collaboration [J].
Borthwick, AC ;
Stirling, T ;
Nauman, AD ;
Cook, DL .
URBAN EDUCATION, 2003, 38 (03) :330-371
[9]  
BRACEY GW, 1990, EDUC LEADERSHIP, V47, P65
[10]  
Bryk AS, 2003, EDUC LEADERSHIP, V60, P40