The phylogenetic positions of three basal-hexapod groups (Protura, Diplura, and Collembola) based on ribosomal RNA gene sequences

被引:84
作者
Luan, YX [1 ]
Mallatt, JM
Xie, RD
Yang, YM
Yin, WY
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Shanghai Inst Biol Sci, Inst Plant Physiol & Ecol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Washington State Univ, Sch Biol Sci, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
关键词
Protura; Diplura; Collembola; ribosomal RNA genes; molecular phylogeny;
D O I
10.1093/molbev/msi148
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study combined complete 18S with partial 28S ribosomal RNA gene sequences (similar to 2,000 nt in total) to investigate the relations of basal hexapods. Ten species of Protura, 12 of Diplura, and 10 of Collembola (representing all subgroups of these three clades) were sequenced, along with 5 true insects and 8 other arthropods, which served as out-groups. Trees were constructed with maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, Bayesian analysis, and minimum-evolution analysis of LogDet-transformed distances. All methods yielded strong support for a clade of Protura plus Diplura, here named Nonoculata, and for monophyly of the Diplura. Parametric-bootstrapping analysis showed our data to be inconsistent with previous hypotheses (P < 0.01) that joined Protura with Collembola (Ellipura), that said Diplura are sister to true insects or are diphyletic, and that said Collembola are not hexapods. That is, our data are consistent with hexapod monophyly and Collembola grouped weakly with "Protura + Diplura" under most analytical conditions. As a caveat to the above conclusions, the sequences showed nonstationarity of nucleotide frequencies across taxa, so the CG-rich sequences of the diplurans and proturans may have grouped together artifactually; however, the fact that the LogDet method supported this group lessens this possibility. Within the basal hexapod groups, where nucleotide frequencies were stationary, traditional taxonomic subgroups generally were recovered: i.e., within Protura, the Eosentomata and Acerentomata (but Sinentomata was not monophyletic); within Collembola, the Arthropleona, Poduromorpha, and Entomobryomorpha (but Symphypleona was polyphyletic); and in Diplura, the most complete data set (> 2,100 nt) showed monophyly of Campodeoidea and of Japygoidea, and most methods united Projapygoidea with Japygoidea.
引用
收藏
页码:1579 / 1592
页数:14
相关论文
共 93 条
  • [1] ABELE LG, 1989, MOL BIOL EVOL, V6, P685
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2003, INVERTEBRATES
  • [3] EVIDENCE FROM 12S RIBOSOMAL-RNA SEQUENCES THAT ONYCHOPHORANS ARE MODIFIED ARTHROPODS
    BALLARD, JWO
    OLSEN, GJ
    FAITH, DP
    ODGERS, WA
    ROWELL, DM
    ATKINSON, PW
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1992, 258 (5086) : 1345 - 1348
  • [4] Bilinski S., 1994, INSECT OVARY ULTRAST, P7
  • [5] The phylogenetic interrelationships of the higher taxa of apterygote hexapods
    Bitsch, C
    Jacques, B
    [J]. ZOOLOGICA SCRIPTA, 2000, 29 (02) : 131 - 156
  • [6] Phylogenetic relationships of basal hexapods among the mandibulate arthropods: a cladistic analysis based on comparative morphological characters
    Bitsch, C
    Bitsch, J
    [J]. ZOOLOGICA SCRIPTA, 2004, 33 (06) : 511 - 550
  • [7] Gene translocation links insects and crustaceans
    Boore, JL
    Lavrov, DV
    Brown, WM
    [J]. NATURE, 1998, 392 (6677) : 667 - 668
  • [8] DEDUCING THE PATTERN OF ARTHROPOD PHYLOGENY FROM MITOCHONDRIAL-DNA REARRANGEMENTS
    BOORE, JL
    COLLINS, TM
    STANTON, D
    DAEHLER, LL
    BROWN, WM
    [J]. NATURE, 1995, 376 (6536) : 163 - 165
  • [9] Borner Carl, 1910, Biologisches Zentralblatt Leipzig, V30
  • [10] Boudreaux H., 1979, ARTHROPOD PHYLOGENY