Life-Cycle Assessment of Urban Water Provision: Tool and Case Study in California

被引:58
作者
Stokes, Jennifer [1 ]
Horvath, Arpad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Inst Transportat Studies, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
Water supply; System analysis; Sustainable development; Water use; Renewable energy; California; Systems analysis; Sustainability; Energy; PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGIES; POTABLE WATER; ENERGY; SYSTEMS; LCA; DESALINATION; MANAGEMENT; SLUDGE; POWER;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000036
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The exploration of life-cycle energy use and environmental effects from U. S. water infrastructure has been limited in spite of the strong connection between energy and water use. This research presents a methodology for quantifying the life-cycle energy consumption and associated air emissions from water supply, treatment, and distribution. A decision-support tool, the Water-Energy Sustainability Tool (WEST), has been developed to aid such analysis. WEST calculates the environmental effects of material production, including the supply chain, material delivery and transportation, construction and maintenance equipment use, energy production, and sludge disposal. Deterministic and probabilistic results for a California case study utility are provided to show the tool's capabilities. Results indicate that producing a million liters of water consumes 5.4 GJ and produces 390 kg of CO(2)-equivalent greenhouse gases. Energy production is the most significant activity (50%), but material production, especially for treatment chemicals, is also important (37%). This case study is contrasted with two previously published case study utilities, and the reasons for the range of results are analyzed. The results demonstrate that estimating water supply's energy needs and emissions without a life-cycle lens can underestimate the total effects significantly. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000036. (C) 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 24
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life-cycle assessment of high-speed rail: the case of California
    Chester, Mikhail
    Horvath, Arpad
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 5 (01):
  • [2] An Italian case study of life cycle assessment for a drinking water dispenser
    Bianco, Vincenzo
    Cascetta, Furio
    Nardini, Sergio
    Plomitallo, Renato Elpidio
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2024,
  • [3] Life-cycle assessment of electricity in Portugal
    Garcia, Rita
    Marques, Pedro
    Freire, Fausto
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 134 : 563 - 572
  • [4] Environmental life cycle assessment for potable water production - a case study of seawater desalination and mine-water reclamation in South Africa
    Goga, T.
    Friedrich, E.
    Buckley, C. A.
    WATER SA, 2019, 45 (04) : 700 - 709
  • [5] An integrated framework of life-cycle environmental, human health, and economic impact assessment for urban water systems
    Wang, Yu-yao
    Yeung, Chok Hang
    Hu, Xiao-meng
    Li, Xiao-yan
    WATER RESEARCH, 2025, 278
  • [6] Life-cycle assessment as an environmental management tool in the production of potable water
    Friedrich, E
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 46 (09) : 29 - 36
  • [7] Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Wastewater Treatment Plants: A Case Study of Tehran, Iran
    Tabesh, Massoud
    Masooleh, Maryam Feizee
    Roghani, Bardia
    Motevallian, Seyed Sajed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 17 (7A) : 1155 - 1169
  • [8] Life-cycle assessment of windows in Israel
    Pushkar, Svetlana
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 171 (06) : 296 - 303
  • [9] Avoiding unintended tradeoffs by integrating life-cycle impact assessment with urban metabolism
    Chester, Mikhail
    Pincetl, Stephanie
    Allenby, Braden
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2012, 4 (04) : 451 - 457
  • [10] Life-cycle uses of water in US electricity generation
    Fthenakis, Vasilis
    Kim, Hyung Chul
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (07) : 2039 - 2048