A prospective comparison of the selective observation and routine exploration methods for penetrating abdominal stab wounds with organ or omentum evisceration

被引:52
作者
Arikan, S [1 ]
Kocakusak, A [1 ]
Yucel, AF [1 ]
Adas, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Haseki Educ & Res Hosp, Gen Surg Clin, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE | 2005年 / 58卷 / 03期
关键词
penetrating abdominal stab wounds; evisceration; selective observation;
D O I
10.1097/01.TA.0000152498.71380.3E
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. Both routine laparotomy and selective observation methods have been used in the treatment of penetrating abdominal stab wounds with organ or omentum evisceration. There still are some conflicts about these treatment methods. Methods. Between 1998 and 2003, 61 patients treated in the authors' emergency clinic because of penetrating abdominal stab wounds with organ or omentum evisceration were evaluated prospectively. Excepting those with absolute indications for mandatory laparotomy, these patients were treated by either routine laparotomy or selective observation methods. Their prognosis, rates of unnecessary laparotomy, length of hospital stay, and complications were compared using Fisher's exact test and Student's t test. Results. Nine patients underwent mandatory laparotomy and were therefore excluded from the study. The overall incidence of the patients who had no significant abdominal pathology was 54.1% (33/61). The overall incidence of significant injuries among the asymptomatic patients was 36.5% (19/52). Routine laparotomy was performed for 21 patients, who experienced unnecessary laparotomy and complication rates of 33.33% and 19%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay in this group was 137.38 +/- 53.25 hours. Of 31 patients, 24 who had been treated by selective observation methods were discharged without laparotomy. The unnecessary laparotomy and complication rates for this group were 6.45% (28.6% for the patients treated surgically) and 3.2%, respectively, whereas the mean lengt h of hospital stay for this group was 81.22 +/- 42.46 hours. There were statistically significant differences in terms of unnecessary laparotomy rates and mean lengths of hospital stay, but no difference in terms of complication rates. Conclusion: The selective observation method is safe and superior to routine laparotomy for the treatment of penetrating abdominal stab wounds with omentum evisceration.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 532
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [11] RECURRENT ADHESIVE SMALL-BOWEL OBSTRUCTION
    JONES, PF
    MUNRO, A
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 9 (06) : 868 - 875
  • [12] Indications for early mandatory laparotomy in abdominal stab wounds
    Leppäniemi, AK
    Voutilainen, PE
    Haapiainen, RK
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 86 (01) : 76 - 80
  • [13] LIEBENBERG ND, 1988, S AFR MED J, V74, P231
  • [14] Video thoracoscopy expedites the diagnosis and treatment of penetrating diaphragmatic injuries
    Martinez, M
    Briz, JE
    Carillo, EH
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2001, 15 (01): : 28 - 32
  • [15] McFarlane MEC, 1996, J ROY COLL SURG EDIN, V41, P239
  • [16] MEDINA M, 1984, CAN J SURG, V27, P399
  • [17] NEGATIVE FINDINGS ON LAPAROTOMY FOR TRAUMA
    MILLER, FB
    CRYER, HM
    CHILIKURI, S
    CREECH, P
    RICHARDSON, JD
    [J]. SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 82 (10) : 1231 - 1234
  • [18] Value of digital exploration for diagnosing injuries to the left side of the diaphragm caused by stab wounds
    Morales, CH
    Villegas, MI
    Angel, W
    Vásquez, JJ
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2001, 136 (10) : 1131 - 1135
  • [19] Evisceration after abdominal stab wounds: Is laparotomy required?
    Nagy, K
    Roberts, R
    Joseph, K
    Barrett, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1999, 47 (04): : 622 - 624
  • [20] SELECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF ANTERIOR ABDOMINAL STAB WOUNDS
    ROBIN, AP
    ANDREWS, JR
    LANGE, DA
    ROBERTS, RR
    MOSKAL, M
    BARRETT, JA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1989, 29 (12): : 1684 - 1689