Early Challenge with Oncogenic Marek's Disease Virus Does Not Interfere with Load of Marek's Disease Vaccines DNA in the Feather Pulp at 7 Days of Age

被引:0
作者
Boyett, T. [1 ]
Thiemann, R. [1 ,2 ]
Correa, M. [1 ]
Cortes, A. L. [1 ]
Gimeno, I. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] North Carolina State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Populat Hlth & Pathobiol, Raleigh, NC 27607 USA
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Starkville, MS 39762 USA
关键词
Marek's disease; vaccination; control; qPCR; feather pulp; RISPENS CVI988 VACCINE; REPLICATION KINETICS; VIRULENT-STRAINS; CELL-CULTURE; HERPESVIRUS; CHICKENS; PROTECTION; INFECTION; EFFICACY; RECOMBINANT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
In the last decade, monitoring Marek's disease (MD) vaccination by real-time PCR has become a common practice. Evaluating in vivo replication of MD vaccines in the feather pulp (FP) at 7 days of age provides information on how well a flock has been vaccinated. Factors such as vaccine dose, combination with other vaccines, age and route of vaccination, and the origin of the vaccine can influence the results and need to be taken into consideration. Early infection with oncogenic MD virus (MDV) could also affect how vaccines replicate in the first week and therefore might influence the results. The objective of this study was to evaluate if coinfection with oncogenic MDV could affect MD vaccine DNA viral load in the FP at 7 days of age. A retrospective study was done using data from nine animal experiments (46 treatment groups) in which chickens were vaccinated against MD either in ovo or at 1 day of age and challenged with various oncogenic strains at 1 day of age by contact. In each experiment, vaccinated but not challenged groups were used as controls. Replication of MD vaccine was evaluated in samples of FP collected at 7 days of age by real-time PCR, and percentage of positives and vaccine load were analyzed. Our results show that CVI988 (13 treatment groups), SB-1 (six treatment groups), and in most cases turkey herpesvirus (HVT; 24 out of 27 treatment groups) replication was not affected by early infection with oncogenic MDV. There were three treatment groups in which HVT replication differed between challenged and unchallenged chickens, however the effect was not clear; replication of HVT in nonchallenged chickens was higher (one treatment group) or lower (two treatment groups) than in challenged chickens and factors other than coinfection with MDV might have contributed to such differences.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 111
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Baigent S, 2006, DEV BIOLOGICALS, V126, P271
[2]   Correlation of Marek's disease herpesvirus vaccine virus genome load in feather tips with protection, using an experimental challenge model [J].
Baigent, Susan J. ;
Smith, Lorraine P. ;
Currie, Richard J. W. ;
Nair, Venugopal K. .
AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 2007, 36 (06) :467-474
[3]   Real-time PCR for differential quantification of CVI988 vaccine virus and virulent strains of Marek's disease virus [J].
Baigent, Susan J. ;
Nair, Venugopal K. ;
Le Galludec, Herve .
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2016, 233 :23-36
[4]   In ovo vaccination with herpesvirus of turkey enhances innate and cellular responses in meat-type chickens: Effect of vaccine dose and strain [J].
Boone, Allison C. ;
Kaser, Tobias ;
Cortes, Aneg L. ;
Kulkarni, Raveendra R. ;
Abad, Blanca A. Lopez de Juan ;
Villalobos, Tarsicio ;
Esandi, Javier ;
Perozo, Francisco ;
Lemiere, Stephane ;
Gimeno, Isabel M. .
VACCINE, 2020, 38 (31) :4837-4845
[5]  
Buchen-Osmond C., 2006, ICTVDB THE UNIVERSAL
[6]  
CALNEK BW, 1970, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V45, P341
[7]   IMMUNIZATION AGAINST MAREKS DISEASE USING A LIVE ATTENUATED VIRUS [J].
CHURCHILL, AE ;
PAYNE, LN ;
CHUBB, RC .
NATURE, 1969, 221 (5182) :744-+
[8]  
CHURCHILL AE, 1968, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V41, P951
[9]   Comparison of Blood and Feather Pulp Samples for the Diagnosis of Marek's Disease and for Monitoring Marek's Disease Vaccination by Real Time-PCR [J].
Cortes, Aneg L. ;
Montiel, Enrique R. ;
Lemiere, Stephane ;
Gimeno, Isabel M. .
AVIAN DISEASES, 2011, 55 (02) :302-310
[10]  
Davidson I., 1998, Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine, V53, P25